abc-news national News

Transcript: James Comey’s interview with ABC News chief anchor George Stephanopoulos

Transcript: James Comey's interview with ABC News chief anchor George Stephanopoulos
ABC News’ chief anchor George Stephanopoulos’ interviewed former FBI director James Comey for a particular version of “20/20” that aired on Sunday, April 15, 2018 ahead of the release of Comey’s e-book, “A Higher Loyalty.” The next is the transcript of the interview:

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:Thanks for doing this.

JAMES COMEY:Oh, it is my pleasure. Thanks for coming.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:Easy begin. Why did you write this e-book?

JAMES COMEY:I r– I used to be never going to put in writing a ebook. But I decided I needed to write this one to attempt to be helpful. That was my aim after I used to be fired, to be useful. And it occurred to me perhaps I might be helpful by offering a view to individuals, especially to younger individuals, of what management should seem like and the way it ought to be centered on values. And so–

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:You lay out qualities of an ethical leader. What are they?

JAMES COMEY:At the start, it’s someone who realizes that lasting values should be on the middle of their leadership. Whether or not they’re in authorities or in the personal sector or leading a college, they need to give attention to things like equity and integrity and, most of all, the reality. That the reality issues.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:And you have– there’s virtually a way of– of alarm beneath the whole e-book. You say it’s a dangerous time in our nation?

JAMES COMEY:I feel it is. And– I chose those phrases rigorously. I used to be nervous once I selected the phrase, “Dangerous” first. I assumed, “Is that an overstatement?” And I don’t assume it’s because–


JAMES COMEY:I worry that the norms at the middle of this country– we will battle as People about weapons or taxes or immigration, and we all the time have. However what we’ve got in widespread is a set of norms. Most significantly, the reality. “We hold these truths to be self-evident,” right? Fact is the fourth word of that sentence. That is what we’re. And if we lose that, if we lose tethering of our leaders to that fact, what are we? And so I started to worry. Truly, the inspiration of this nation is in jeopardy once we stop measuring our leaders towards that central value of the truth.


JAMES COMEY:I feel we’re partially. But I feel the power of this country is that we will outlast it. That there will probably be injury to that norm. However I liken President Trump within the ebook to a forest hearth. Going to do super injury. Going to wreck those essential norms. But a forest hearth provides healthy issues a chance to develop that had no probability earlier than that fireplace.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:How can we put it out?

JAMES COMEY:We put it out in two methods. We put it out first by not turning into numb to the truth that the truth is being assailed each day. By not deciding that it’s just too much to pay attention to as a result of that is the trail to dropping fact as the central worth on this country. So all of us should always be involved and call it out once we see the truth endangered, once we see mendacity. And then next, we have to become involved. The American individuals want to stand up in the public square and in the voting sales space and say, “Look, we disagree about an awful lot. But we have in common something that matters enormously to this country. And our leaders must reflect those values.”

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:And– and why the title, “A Higher Loyalty?”

JAMES COMEY:Nicely, partially, the title comes from a weird dialog I had with the president in dinner at the White House in January of final yr, the place he requested for my loyalty personally because the F.B.I. director. My loyalty’s purported to be to the American individuals and to the establishment. But greater than that, it grows out of a lifetime of my making an attempt to be a greater leader and work out what matters in a pacesetter, and realizing from an entire lot better leaders than I, that there have to be a loyalty to something above the pressing, above the political, above the favored. We’ve to assume, “What are the values that matter in the institution I’m involved with and in the country that I care a lot about?”

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:You take a look at your career during the last four many years, you’re just like the Zelig of recent regulation enforcement?

JAMES COMEY:I stick out ’cause I am so tall. I appear in every picture–

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:Y– that is solely part of it. You’ve got taken on the mob, Martha Stewart, proper in the midst of large controversies over authorities surveillance, over torture. What are the large classes you’re taking away from that?

JAMES COMEY:The large lesson from that– and I’ve had a wierd and fantastic career. And I don’t understand how I’ve ended up in all these spots. However the lesson I’ve discovered is that it is essential whenever you’re involved in a troublesome state of affairs with loud voices to in your mind, rise above it and ask, “So what matters in the long run? What does this institution stand for? What does my country stand for?”

It helps you see issues more clearly and understand issues like fact matters, integrity issues. These moral values are what are going to final. And when you must explain what you’ve got accomplished sometime to your grandchildren, that is what is going to matter. Your grandkids won’t understand that people– indignant at me, or the vice chairman of america was telling me individuals have been going to die due to me.

What they will need to know is, “What was your North Star? Why did you make the decision you made?” And I hope your reply’s going to be, “‘Cause I took the time to think about what matters. What my institution stands for and what my country stands for.”

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:Proper initially of your profession, you’re involved in prosecution of main mafia figures. How does that type you?

JAMES COMEY:Properly, it’s a super schooling to get– a view inside La Cosa Nostra, the mafia, both in america and in Sicily. And to comprehend that the mafia is a corporation like another group. Has a pacesetter, has underlings, has values, has rules. They’re completely corrupt. And it is the antithesis of ethical management.

But I didn’t comprehend it at the time. Nevertheless it was forming my view that the truth needs to be central to our lives and that management needs to be targeted on necessary and ethical values. And not what’s good for the boss, how do I accomplish what’s good for the boss and get the boss what he needs.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:Fact on the middle of our lives. That is the– on the middle of the Martha Stewart case as properly?

JAMES COMEY:Sure. The Martha Stewart case was a case that I initially hated.


JAMES COMEY:And didn’t want any part of. We had lots of huge instances happening at that time limit. WorldCom, Adelphia. Enron was happening. We have been making an attempt to research company fraud, large corporate fraud, and ship a message to the American people who the system isn’t rigged, the wealthy aren’t going to get away with frauds, and that’s really exhausting and essential work.

And in the midst of this, walks on this case involving a famous one that seems to have lied throughout an investigation of insider trading. And my preliminary reaction was, “You know, that’s kind of a small thing. That’ll be a big distraction. People will throw rocks at me. But more than that, it’ll take away from this other work we’re doing.”

And folk do not realize this, but I virtually hesitated and virtually did not deliver the case towards Martha Stewart, in hindsight, because she was wealthy and famous. And decided that if she have been anyone else, another abnormal individual, she can be prosecuted. And what helped me come to that conclusion was I remembered a case I might been concerned in towards an African American minister in Richmond once I was a federal prosecutor there, who had lied to us throughout an investigation.

And I begged this minister, “Please don’t lie to us because if you do, we’re going to have to prosecute you.” He lied. And on the finish of the day, we needed to prosecute him. And he went to jail for over a yr. And as I stood in my office in Manhattan, I am searching at the Brooklyn Bridge, I keep in mind this moment. And I’m considering, “You know, nobody in New York knows that guy’s name except me.

“Why would I treat Martha Stewart in a different way than that guy?” And the reason would only be because she’s rich and famous and because I’ll be criticized for it. The truth matters in the criminal justice system. And if it’s going to matter, we must prosecute people who lie in the middle of an investigation.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:You don’t lie to investigators, you don’t lie under oath?

JAMES COMEY:You can’t or the rule of law breaks down. And there once was a day when people were afraid of going to hell if they took an oath in the name of God and violated it. We’ve drifted away from that day. And so in its place has to be a fear that if you lie and the government can prove it beyond a reasonable doubt, they will prosecute you in order to send a message to all the others who might be called upon to give evidence. You must tell the truth. It matters enormously.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:You mentioned that Vice President Cheney– at one point said, “Individuals are going to die because of what you are doing right now.” Take us inside that room?

JAMES COMEY:It was the chief of staff’s room in the West Wing of the White House. And we were engaged– I was at the Justice Department, the number two person at the Justice Department then, the deputy attorney general. And we were in a dispute with the White House about whether there was a lawful basis for surveillance activities that the president had authorized the NSA to engage in in the United States.

And we had concluded, very smart lawyers working for me had concluded and I agreed, that there wasn’t a lawful basis for a big part of these activities. And so we were not going to sign onto it. And there was a meeting to pressure me to change my view. And Vice President Cheney presided at the meeting. He sat at the head of the table.

I sat just to his left. And he looked me in the eye and said, “Hundreds of individuals are going to die due to what you are doing.” W– what he meant was, “Because you make us stop this surveillance program,” because there was no lawful basis for it, “individuals are going to die ‘explanation for what you are doing.”

And my reaction was, and I said it to him, “That’s not serving to me. That makes me feel badly. I don’t want individuals to die. I’ve devoted my life to making an attempt to guard harmless individuals. But I have to say what the Justice Department can certify to, what we discover lawful. And that you simply actually need it or that it is essential does not change the regulation. And so I– I can not my view.” And so it was thick with tension and it was– I felt like I was going to be crushed like a grape, frankly. But in a way, there was no other way I could act. The law was clear. And so how could I possibly, as the leader of the Justice Department, sign up to something that we had no lawful basis for. And so we stood our ground.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:That same issue led to a now famous confrontation in the hospital room of the attorney general at the time, John Ashcroft. You sped to that room. Why?

JAMES COMEY:Yeah, I did. I think it was the next day after the meeting with Vice President Cheney when I was on the way home, driving along Constitution Avenue. So on my left, I could see the Washington Monument. On the right, we’re coming up on the ellipse where you can see the White House. And the phone rang.

It was– the attorney general, my boss was John Ashcroft. He was in intensive care. Very, very seriously ill at George Washington Hospital. And his chief of staff was on the phone, telling me that although we had told the White House we can’t certify to this, I’m the acting attorney general, we can’t certify to its lawfulness. And so it has to stop.

He was calling to alert me that the president was sending two of his top people, the White House counsel and the chief of staff, to the intensive care unit at George Washington Hospital to see the attorney general. And so I hung up the phone, told the driver, “Ed, I’ve to get to George Washington Hospital immediately.”

And he didn’t need to hear more than the tone in my voice. And so he turned on the lights and siren and drove this armored vehicle like it was a NASCAR race to George Washington Hospital. We pulled up in front. I jumped out with my security detail. And I ran into the hospital and ran up the stairs. Didn’t wait for the elevator to get to that floor because I needed to be there to make sure a desperately ill man wasn’t asked to sign something when he wasn’t competent to sign it and I was the acting attorney general.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:And in the end, he didn’t sign it?

JAMES COMEY:In the end, he was remarkable. I went into that hospital room and got there before they did. And I tried to orient Attorney General Ashcroft as to time and place. And he didn’t seem to be following me. He looked gravely ill, gray and lying in his bed, barely conscious. And I then sat down next to him as close to him as I am to you.

His wife stood on the other side of the bed the entire time and never let go of his arm. And I waited. And two of my staff members stood behind me. I didn’t know that one of them was taking notes the whole time. But in came the White House chief of staff and the– the– the White House counsel. And they were carrying an envelope. And they were going to try and get John Ashcroft to sign off on this program that we had said couldn’t continue because it didn’t have a lawful basis.

And they started speaking to him. And he shocked me by pushing himself up on his elbows and blasting them. And telling them he had been misled, he hadn’t understood what they were doing. They had deprived him of the legal advice he needed. And then exhausted, he fell back. And as he fell back, he said, “However that doesn’t matter as a result of I am not the lawyer common.” And then he pointed at me and said, “There’s the lawyer basic.” And the two men didn’t acknowledge me. They just turned. One said, “Be properly” to the attorney general, and then they walked out.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:And in the book, you describe an incident after that, a tender moment between Robert Mueller and Mr. Ashcroft?

JAMES COMEY:Yes. I called Bob Mueller– as the armored vehicle was being driven like it was a NASCAR race to the hospital, I called Bob Mueller, then the F.B.I. director. He was out at dinner with his family. And I told him what was happening. He had been following the conflict with the White House. The F.B.I. was a key participant in the program.

And so Bob Mueller’s view was, “If the F– if the Justice Department can’t find a lawful foundation for this, there is no approach the F.B.I. is collaborating.” The F.B.I., as folks may know, is a separate organization, but it sits within the Justice Department. And so I called Bob and told him what was happening. And I wanted him to know about it because of his stature and his ability. He and I weren’t close, we weren’t friends in any social sense. But I knew he saw it the way I did. And I knew that his gravitas, his– his experience, his weight, would be important. And he said, “I’ll be proper there.”

And then he started a race to the hospital. He didn’t get to the hospital until after the two senior White House officials had turned and left. But he came in moments later and he stood and s– leaned down and spoke to the desperately ill attorney general and told him that, in every man’s life, there comes a time when the good Lord tests him. And then he said, “You’ve got handed your check tonight.”

And I was– it was a really hard time. And I was overcome with emotion, hearing that. And– had this sense that the law held. The law held. It– it felt like a dream to me, that we were in a hospital room with senior officials trying to get the desperately ill attorney general to sign something. But it wasn’t a dream. And the law held.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:In that same administration– you had the controversy over torture, whether or not it could be justified and legal. And there’s– a remarkable moment with your wife, Patrice. She doesn’t know all the details of what you’re going through, but she says?

JAMES COMEY:Yeah, that was remark– it actually irritated me a little bit. I love her desperately. But she’s great at giving me feedback. And she had seen on the news– didn’t know what I was working on, but had seen on the news all the controversy around the treatment of prisoners at a U.S. prison in Iraq called Abu Ghraib.

And there was a great deal of news and debate about whether the American government was engaged in torture. She knew that and she also knew I was under some sorta great stress. This is after the stress of the surveillance battle. And she said to me one evening, “Don’t be the torture man.” And I said, “Wha– you understand I can not speak to you about that kinda stuff.”

And she said, “I do not need to speak about it. Just don’t be the torture guy.” And she repeated that periodically thereafter. And I’ve since told her, “Look, that was not helpful except your voice echoed around my head an awful lot throughout that.” What she meant was, “Rise above and keep in mind, someday you are going to clarify to your grandchildren the way you carried out yourself.”

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:You still think it wasn’t helpful?

JAMES COMEY:Oh, it was helpful. In the moment– it w– it was helpful. In– in the moment, it was irritating because I wanted to say, “You haven’t any concept how arduous these legal points are. You haven’t any concept that Congress defined torture in American felony regulation in another way than you and I might perceive it. So saying, ‘Don’t be the torture man,’ I don’t need to be. But my job as a lawyer is to say, ‘This is what the statute means.'” And there’s a whole lot that would pass muster under the statute, that I would think that any normal person would think is torture.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:Explain that to– to everybody watching at home because I think that it would be hard for people to understand. You really can’t talk to your wife about the things you’re working on?

JAMES COMEY:Yeah. It adds to your level of stress. The– the way the rule works– the rules are, if you’re dealing with a classified matter, you may only discuss it with someone who has a need to know it, a work related need, and the appropriate clearance. Well, your spouse has neither– I guess unless your spouse works with you in the government, on that particular matter.

But as much as I loved her and as important as an advisor she’s been to me my whole life, she didn’t have a need to know anything about the classified topics I worked on. And she didn’t have the appropriate clearance. She’s an extraordinarily trustworthy person, but she doesn’t have the appropriate clearance.

And so she would know, during surveillance and during torture, something was disturbing my sleep. Something was making me come home very late at night, leave very early in the morning. But she could only guess what it was. In the surveillance fight she couldn’t guess ’cause it was totally secret. In the torture battle, she could have some idea ’cause she could see it on the news.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:Right at the top of the book, y– you write that you’re aware that it could be seen as an exercise in vanity.


GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:What are you worried about there?

JAMES COMEY:Well, that’s why I was never going to write a book. It always felt like an exercise in ego. And one of the things I’ve struggled with my whole life is my ego and– and a sense that I– I have to be careful not to fall in love with my own view of things. And so that battle with ego and my sense that memoirs are an exercise in ego convinced me I was never going to write a book.

And I’m sure friends of mine from college and law school are out there laughing right now, saying, “Ah-ha, he wrote a guide.” I never wanted to write a memoir. And I hope folks will read the book ’cause my goal was to be useful. It’s not a memoir. Lots of stories about my life that aren’t in there, important stories. But I tried to pick stories that relate to leadership to try and explain, including mistakes I’ve made, how I think about ethical leadership and what I think it ought to be.

I’m not a perfect leader. There– I don’t think there are any perfect leaders. But I’ve learned from working with great people, from making a lot of mistakes, and from working for people who aren’t effective leaders, here’s what I think it should be. And so that’s what I’m trying to offer in the book.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:As you say, no one’s perfect. What’s James Comey’s rap on James Comey?

JAMES COMEY:How much time do you have? Yeah. My rap on myself is that– is that ego focus. That I– since I was a kid, I’ve had a sense of confidence. That I know I’m good at certain things. And there’s a danger that that will bleed over into pride, into not being open minded to the fact that I could be wrong and other people could have a better view of it.

And so I think that’s my primary worry about myself, is an overconfidence that can lead to that– that pride, that closed mindedness. I’ve tried to guardrail that my whole life. First of all, by marrying someone who will tell me anything at any time. But then also surrounding myself with people who will cut through that and say– “No, no, no, no. Decelerate. Have you considered this? Have you considered that?”

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:So you don’t mind– and you write this as well, the uncomfortable questions?

JAMES COMEY:I have to have them because, again, if what I worry about myself most is that I’ll be– convince myself that I’m doing the right thing, if I don’t have people who will push through that, who will try and pierce whatever certainty I’m feeling, I may make a bad decision. I may make a big mistake.

And part of that is just aging and getting to realize that doubt is not a weakness. Doubt is a strength. Always remembering I could be wrong until the moment you make a decision is important. And that’s great to tell yourself. But it’s also important to have people around you who will poke at you, poke at you, poke at you.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:Another short chapter in your career, you were part of the Senate Whitewater investigation of the Clintons. Wha– what exactly did you do?

JAMES COMEY:I worked for five months as a staff lawyer on the banking committee’s special committee I think they called it on the Whitewater investigation. My role was to focus on the suicide of a White House official who was the deputy White House counsel–


JAMES COMEY:–named Vincent Foster, yeah. And whether any documents were taken from his office and mishandled. I was only there five months. Patrice and I had a personal tragedy. We had a healthy baby boy, Collin Comey. Was born after I’d been there five months and died unfortunately of a infection that was preventable. And so I never went back.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:And later, you also were involved in– the prosecution or at least investigating whether Bill Clinton as president did anything improper in the pardon of Marc Rich?

JAMES COMEY:That’s right. When I became U.S. attorney in Manhattan after 9/11, I inherited from my predecessor, Mary Jo White, an investigation into whether there was any corruption associated with a pardon that President Clinton had given to a fugitive named Marc Rich and his codefendant, Pincus Green.

These were guys who had been charged with a massive tax fraud case and– and trading with the enemy and had fled to Switzerland and had been there for many years. And President Clinton, on his way out the door, pardoned them, which was extraordinary.

Actually, I’ve never heard of another case where a fugitive from justice was pardoned. And so the F.B.I. and the U.S. attorney’s office were investigating were there promised contributions made to the Clinton Library or something else to secure that pardon. And so as the new boss in Manhattan, I oversaw that.


JAMES COMEY:Concluded there was not sufficient evidence to bring any charges in that case. And so we closed it.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:Did you draw any conclusions about the Clintons, about Hillary Clinton, from those experiences?



JAMES COMEY:No. I had– first of all, I’ve never met her. And my engagement was very limited. The five months on the Whitewater case was focused on Vince Foster and his office. One of the questions was had the– the then first lady, Hillary Clinton, caused anyone to go remove documents from his office. I don’t remember what the conclusion was, but I didn’t re– reach any conclusion about her.

And same with the pardon business. President Clinton’s pardon of Marc Rich took my breath away. Th– the notion that the president of the United States would pardon a fugitive without asking the prosecutors or the investigators, “What do you assume,” was shocking to me. But it didn’t give me any view of Hillary Clinton.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:So what did you think of Hillary Clinton before the email investigation began?

JAMES COMEY:Seemed like a smart person, very hardworking. Had been obviously a U.S. senator and had a reputation– again, I get only this– I get this from the media, as a very hardworking person. Had worked very hard as secretary of state. That was really about it.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:And then on July 6th, 2015, there’s a referral about her email case. What do you do?

JAMES COMEY:Yeah, in early July the inspector general for the intelligence community, which is an– an organization that looks for fraud, waste and abuse or violation of standards in the intelligence community, sent a referral that was public actually to the Department of Justice and the F.B.I., raising concern that there might’ve been mishandling of classified information on Hillary Clinton’s email server, which was a personal email server device she had in her basement. And that came in in early July. I didn’t focus on it. Shortly thereafter, the F.B.I. opened a criminal investigation. And I didn’t know when we’d opened it. I was b–

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:So this was far below your level?

JAMES COMEY:Yeah. F.B.I.’s an enormous organization. It was opened in the ordinary course in our counterintelligence division. Then eventually, it got briefed up to me by the deputy director, who’s the senior agent in the organization, telling me that we’ve opened this criminal investigation of Secretary Clinton.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:But that’s the kinda thing that gets briefed up pretty quickly, doesn’t it?

JAMES COMEY:Yeah, yeah. I’m just saying, I didn’t know– I didn’t know bef– as I recall, I didn’t know before they opened it that they were opening it, but nothing untoward about that–

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:And it wasn’t your order to open the investigation–

JAMES COMEY:Correct. Correct.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:And describe what exactly was at issue, what you were looking at?

JAMES COMEY:The question was, was classified information mishandled. And what that means is did anybody talk about classified information outside of a system that you’re supposed to talk about classified information on? Did anybody give classified documents to someone who shouldn’t have them?

What it centered on there was Secretary Clinton used this personal email domain to conduct all her business as secretary of state. She didn’t use government email. And what the inspector general raised was in emailing, in doing her work on that unclassified system, did she and those around her talk about classified topics?

Classified information is either the lowest level confidential, the next level secret, the top level top secret. And there’s rules about how you can email about that information and where you should talk about it. And the question was did they talk about topics on an unclassified system that shouldn’t have been on an unclassified system?

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:And this had come right on the heels of a very famous case– involving General David Petraeus for his mishandling of classified information. Something that was– prosecuted. He eventually had a plea. As you know, many of your conservative critics– say that the David Petraeus case was far [less] serious than the Hillary Clinton case. Yet, you chose not to prosecute. Answer that.

JAMES COMEY:Well, the David Petraeus case was, to my mind, not a close case at all. He was the director of the C.I.A. He was having a romantic relationship with a woman who was also an author, going to write a book about him. He had taken home and stored in a backpack notebooks full of notes about some of the government’s most sensitive secrets. Classified at the top level in the government, including conversations with President Obama about special access programs, some of our– our most closely guarded secrets.

And he had given these notebooks to this person who had neither a need to know, nor the appropriate clearance. And he’d actually allowed her to photograph pages containing top secret information. And then, when the F.B.I. interviewed him about it, he lied about it. And so you had clearly intentional misconduct by a guy who’s in charge of the country’s secrets as the director of the C.I.A., involving huge trove of our top level classified information. And then obstruction of justice.

It was not a close call. In fact, I thought David Petraeus should’ve been prosecuted not just for the mishandling of the classified information, but also for lying to the F.B.I. because lying is– strikes at the heart of our rule of law in this country. And in the end, the attorney general at the time, Eric Holder, decided he would be charged only with the misdemeanor mishandling of classified information.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:Y– you also write that you– you knew from the start that the Clinton case was unlikely to be prosecuted. Some of your critics, including President Trump, think that– that you brought a prejudgment to the case?

JAMES COMEY:Yeah. There’s wrong– what– what the F.B.I. brought to the case– folks forget I didn’t actually do this investigation. I supervised an organization that did it, is a knowledge about how these cases are handled in the counterespionage world. That’s the world where mishandling of classified information is investigated. And so we have a 50 year history of knowing what will the Department of Justice prosecute?

They’ll prosecute cases like David Petraeus’. But they’re very unlikely to prosecute a case unless you can show the person, like Petraeus, clearly knew they were doing something they shouldn’t do. There’s evidence of obstruction of justice or disloyalty to the United States, spy– indications.

But without those, sloppiness, even extreme sloppiness, is handled through administrative discipline. Somebody is not prosecuted. And I’ve gone through 50 years of cases. I don’t know of a case where anyone has ever been prosecuted for just being careless, even extremely careless. And so when the case was open, we know that history.

And so the investigators knew that, unless they found something that was a smoking gun, where someone told Secretary Clinton, “You understand, you should not be doing this,” or where she acknowledged it or where somehow there’s an indication of her obstructing justice, the case was unlikely to be prosecuted.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:One of the things that President Trump and his allies bring up is that at some point, her staff smashed Blackberries, also whitewashed the server?

JAMES COMEY:Yeah. There was evidence that old Blackberries, after she was finished with them, they destroyed them, which I think a fair number of people do to make sure that if it’s resold, someone doesn’t end up with your information. And that after they produced information back to the d– to the Department of State, they used– a software program to clean the server to make sure there was nothing on it, or clean laptops to make sure there’s nothing on them.

They did that. But as investigators, our question is, when they did that, are they trying to obstruct justice in some ways? And we could never establish, develop the evidence– evidence is a different thing from what people say. Evidence that anybody who did that did it with a corrupt intent. And most importantly, any indication that Secretary Clinton knew that was happening and knew that it was an effort to obstruct justice.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:You did know from the start that this case was going to be trouble for you. You tell of a scene with your deputy director?

JAMES COMEY:Yeah. I knew this was a no-win situation, this case. America is in an unusually polarized state. We’ve just opened a criminal investigation of one of the people who will likely be candidate for president of the United States in the middle of that viciously partisan atmosphere. One half of the partisan divide is going to be angry at us no matter what we do.

Of course, at the time, I had no idea that I could make both halves angry at us, but we’ll come to that later. But the deputy director who was a great deputy director and a longtime special agent, looked at me and said, “You recognize you are totally screwed, right?” And I smiled. And I said, “Yup. No one will get out alive.” And, of course, it was gallows humor. And it was funny because it was an actual gallows.

If we decide there is no criminal case there and we recommend no prosecution, the Republicans will be screaming that we let, you know, the greatest crime go since the Rosenbergs were executed for selling our nuclear secrets. And if we prosecute her, the Democrats will scream that we’re just doing it out of some sort of partisan bias because I’m a former Republican appointee and so the system is rigged against Hillary Clinton. Either way, we were going to be attacked.

And this may sound strange, that’s kind of freeing. If you know you’re totally screwed and you know that people are going to be angry at you no matter what you do, y– you can’t do anything about it. And so you just put your f– head down and you do your job. And you let the facts and the law decide what you should do.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:First big controversy comes up– late that summer, September, 2015. You have a meeting with the attorney general Loretta Lynch because you’ve decided to say publicly there is a criminal investigation– of Hillary Clinton, which many considered a break with precedent?

JAMES COMEY:Yeah, it was not a break with precedent, but y– you’re right. In the late summer after the investigation had been opened for three months and the whole world was talking about it, ’cause you remember, it began with a public referral from the inspector general. So the candidates were talking about it. Congress was talking about it. The people we were out there interviewing were talking about it.

I went to the attorney general and said, “You and I are both going to have public occasions coming within the next–” I think it was a few days later. “Do you assume it is time to do what the Department of Justice coverage permits, within the applicable case the place there is a public interest that justifies it, confirming that you’ve an investigation?” And she agreed.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:She– but– she agreed. But you write that she didn’t want to call it an investigation?

JAMES COMEY:That’s right. She agreed. Loretta Lynch I had a great relationship with and still have a lot of respect for. And she said, “I agree. But name it a matter.” And I said, “Why would I do this?” And she said, “Just call it a matter.” And I didn’t know exactly why she was doing that, but I decided in that moment that the whole world would miss the distinction between investigation and matter. And so I dropped it at that point. At my press event, I said– used the term matter, and I was right, the press missed it and said we’d confirmed an investigation.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:Did– did you think she was doing that to protect Hillary Clinton?

JAMES COMEY:I didn’t know. It worried me. It gave me an uncomfortable feeling because the Clinton campaign, since the matter had come in, the investigation had started in July, had been trying to come up with other words to describe it. They had used “Evaluation” I think, “Safety referral,” things like that. And it did worry me that the attorney general’s direction was tracking that effort to avoid using the word “investigation.” And so, to be honest, it gave me a bad feeling. And maybe I should’ve pushed harder in the moment.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:Yeah, did you push her on it?

JAMES COMEY:I didn’t because I’ve known Loretta for a long time. We worked a case together in the early 1990s. And she’s a very smart person. And if she’d had a reason that I couldn’t see in Justice Department policy or something, she’da given it to me. But her answer, “Simply do it,” told me this is an order from the attorney general. So it’s not improper, it’s a little bit off axis from the actual facts. But people are going to miss the distinction. And so I’m not going to fight this new attorney general. This is not going to be our first battle.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:You think you should have?

JAMES COMEY:Yeah, I probably should have. Given that I respect Loretta, I probably should’ve pushed harder in the moment.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:The investigation proceeds. And your initial instinct– is confirmed by the investigation. So that by– I guess it is by spring, 2016, you’re pretty clear you’re not going to prosecute– Hillary Clinton. And you say you took one weekend, I think it was in May, 2016, and began to draft– a statement explaining the decision. Again, President Trump looks at that and says you were “Writing the r– the conclusion even before you interviewed Hillary Clinton. That’s just incorrect.”

JAMES COMEY:Yeah, I’ve heard that an awful lot, not just from President Trump, but from a lot of former prosecutors and former government people saying, “This exhibits that you simply had prejudged the matter.” Here’s my reaction. And the reason I smile a little bit is anybody who’s actually done investigations knows that if you’ve been investigating something for almost a year and you don’t have a general sense of where it’s likely to end up, you should be fired because you’re incompetent.

If you’ve been investigating for a year, you know that, unless things change, we’re going to head in this direction. Prosecutors and investigators all the time draft indictments before they finish the investigation. Their mind is open that if they find something that changes their view, they won’t bring an indictment. But they know where it’s headed after a year of investigation. Same thing here.

We had looked all around and scrubbed thousands and thousands and thousands of Hillary Clinton’s emails. We had a very clear picture after nine or ten months of investigation of this case. Our mind was open to a couple of facts. Maybe something will change in the final month of the investigation. Or maybe she’ll lie to us during the interview, which is a whole ‘nother kettle of fish. Or maybe we’ll need to do additional investigation.

But after nine or ten months of investigating, it looked like on the current course and speed, this is going to end without charges. And so what will we do? Smart people, competent people plan ahead. If you’re going to charge, you plan ahead. If you’re not going to charge, you plan ahead. And the hard part about this investigation was going to be not charging because the Obama Justice Department could bring charges against Hillary Clinton without claim of bias, political bias, because they’re Democrats.

What would be hard for the Obama Justice Department for a bunch of reasons is not to bring charges about Hillary Clinton. That will be hard to do without jeopardizing the reputation of the institutions of justice. So it required thought to think about, “So how will we finish this in a approach that maximizes confidence that we did it in the correct method, that the system was not rigged?” So that’s what I’m doing in the beginning of May, is trying to think through, “So how will this end if it continues on this course that it’s on now?”

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:And to those who say you should’ve brought Hillary Clinton before a grand jury?

JAMES COMEY:Look, I understand why people ask that. We would actually prefer– most people haven’t been in front of a grand jury. We would prefer with a subject of an investigation to do an informal interview. Lot more flexibility there. You can bring a lot more people and have a lot more people involved in the questioning. And it offers us an opportunity in a less formal setting to poke at someone. They’re still required to tell the truth. That’s another thing that gets lost–

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:Well, President Trump says you should’ve put her under oath.

JAMES COMEY:Yeah. President Trump’s not– I’m– I’m sure his lawyers, given his situation, are focusing him on this. It’s still a crime to lie to the F.B.I. and federal prosecutors, whether or not you’re under oath. It doesn’t matter. If you knowingly tell a false statement to the F.B.I., as Martha Stewart did, as David Petraeus did, as so many others have, you will be prosecuted for it. It doesn’t matter whether you’re under oath or not.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:You interview Hillary Clinton I guess it was July 2nd– 2016. But actually, you’re not there?

JAMES COMEY:No ’cause I’m the dir– at that point, the director of the F.B.I. Only on TV is the director jumping out of helicopters and conducting interviews. My job is to make the final decisions. The pros will do the interview, the agents who had actually been investigating her and crawling all around her life for a year. And that’s the way it should be.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:And after the interview, what did you learn?

JAMES COMEY:Spent a lotta time on the phone with the team that afternoon and learned that we didn’t find anything, the team didn’t, that changed their view of the case. That this was a case that the Department of Justice would never prosecute. And, most importantly, they didn’t want to do additional investigation.

There was nothing she said that they believed we could prove was false. And there was nothing else they needed to run down to see if she was testifying to us falsely. And so the view of the team was, “We’re executed right here. Our view of this case is agency. No prosecutor would prosecute this case.”

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:So if no prosecutor would prosecute this case, why not put out a one line statement, “We decline to prosecute”?

JAMES COMEY:Yeah. It’s a great question and a reasonable question. And the reason I thought that would be inappropriate is the faith and confidence of the American people in the Department of Justice and the F.B.I. are at the core of those organizations. If they’re not believed to be honest, independent and competent, they’re done.

If you issue a one liner from the Obama Justice Department about one of the two candidates for president of the United States, in this case the Democratic nominee for president of the United States, and say, “We’re finished right here,” in the absence of any kind of transparency, corrosive doubt creeps in that the system is rigged somehow. And so my view was– and this is a longstanding practice of the Department of Justice, that in rare cases, you should offer transparency so the American people can take a look at what you did and know that it was done in an honest, competent, independent way.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:The Department of Justice, but not the F.B.I. director?

JAMES COMEY:That’s right. What was unusual about this, in fact unprecedented in my experience, is that I decided it was important that I speak separately from the attorney general. In the– in the ordinary case, what we’d do is what I said publicly, we’d have sent that to the Department of Justice. And the attorney general could announce it in any way the attorney general chose.

What was different here is I decided, given some things that had happened, that to protect the institutions, we actually had to step away from the Department of Justice and tell the American people, “Look, this is what we did. This is what we discovered. This is what we expect. You’ll be able to rely on the very fact this was carried out in an apolitical means. Your organization of justice acted the best way you’d need it to be. And that if I might carried out the traditional factor, that would not have occurred and the establishments would’ve been damaged.”

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:Your critics say this is where your ego got the best of you. This was your original sin?

JAMES COMEY:Yeah, I hear that. And, look, there’s always a risk that I’m blind to how I’m acting. I don’t think so. I knew this would be terrible for me personally. So if it was about ego, why would I step out in front of the organization and get shot a thousand times?

I actually thought, as bad as this’ll be for me personally, this is my obligation, to protect the F.B.I. and the Justice Department. Given all that had gone on, the attorney general of the United States could not credibly announce this result. And if she did, it would do corrosive damage to the institutions of justice.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:Dig into that. Why could the attorney general not credibly announce the results of this investigation?

JAMES COMEY:Well, for a bunch of reasons. And it sort of built over the course of the investigation. First of all, we had the problem that President Obama had twice publicly basically said, “There is no there, there.” In an interview with– on Fox, an interview on 60 Minutes I think, both times he said that. So that’s his Justice Department.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:Did that surprise you?

JAMES COMEY:It really did surprise me. He’s a very smart man and a lawyer. And so it surprised me. He shouldn’t have done it. It was inappropriate–

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:Did you think he was trying to color the case?

JAMES COMEY:I don’t know. I don’t think so. He didn’t have any insight into the case, at least as far as I know, more than anybody reading the newspaper did, which was zero ’cause there were no leaks. I think he felt a pressure in the political environment because he wanted Hillary Clinton to be elected, to give her a shot in the arm. And so he spoke about an investigation. And he shouldn’t have done that. But that, as you can imagine, created this drumbeat that the Obama Justice Department, the fix is in because the president has told them what result they should reach.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:So that’s one reason that the Justice Department is compromised. What’s reason number two?

JAMES COMEY:Reason number two. And I have to talk about it very carefully. Classified information came into the possession of the U.S. intelligence community in the early part of 2016 that indicated there was material out there that raised the question of whether Loretta Lynch was controlling me and the F.B.I. and keeping the Clinton campaign informed about our investigation.

Now, I don’t believe that. And I don’t believe that’s true. But there was material that I knew someday, when it’s declassified, and I thought that would be decades in the future, would cause historians to wonder, “Hmm, was there some strange enterprise happening there? Was Loretta Lynch someway in — carrying water for the marketing campaign and controlling what the F.B.I. did?”

Again, it wasn’t true. But there was material that would allow that to come out someday in the long future when it’s declassified. That all changed when someday, in my mind, became maybe tomorrow. That was in the middle of June, when the Russian government, using some fronts, started dumping stolen material that had been hacked from organizations associated with the Democratic party in the United States. And all of a sudden, it dawned on me that that someday decades from now when this material comes out actually may be now, tomorrow. And again, even though I didn’t believe it, the material was real. Whether what it said was true or not, I didn’t know. But it would allow people, partisans and even people who were partisans, to strongly argue that something was wrong with the way the investigation–

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:Did you investigate it?


GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:And what did you find?

JAMES COMEY:Found no indication that it was true.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:Boy. So– so– so you find no indication this is true. And yet– you write that this is the reason you went out on your own–

JAMES COMEY:One of the reasons.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:One of the reasons. Doesn’t that cast a cloud over the attorney general, an unjustified cloud over the attorney general?

JAMES COMEY:In a way, yeah. I mean, I like Loretta. As I said, I respect her even today. And so in a way, it’s unfair to her. But when you’re in the business of running a Justice Department institution, what people think matters. Public faith and confidence is everything to the Justice Department.

And so whether or not it was true, the fact that it would be out there and allow people to argue that something terrible was going on in this investigation cut in favor of more transparency. I’m not saying it’s true. But because it will undermine confidence in our work, the way to react to that is show people your work. And again, Justice Department policy allows for this. What made it different was the separation between the F.B.I. and the Justice Department. Now, that– of course, that material– so– I’m talking about it carefully because it’s still classified, that was just one brick in the load. The– the major brick in the load happened just before–


JAMES COMEY:–the Clinton email–

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:–yeah, and I want to get to that–

JAMES COMEY:–entered.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:–in a second. But I know you can’t talk about it, but I’ve read about it. I think a lotta the country has read about it as well. These are emails or memos released by the Russians. The F.B.I. knows they’re junk. How can you then allow that to influence this decision?

JAMES COMEY:Yeah, that’s tricky for me ’cause– ’cause the F.B.I.’s told me that I have to be very careful speaking about this ’cause it’s still classified. What I can say is the material is legitimate. It– it is real. The content is real. Now, whether the content is true is a different question. And again, to my mind, I believed it was not true.

I– I didn’t see any indication that Loretta Lynch was trying to cover this investigation for the Clinton campaign or direct me in any way. She stayed away from it as far as I could tell. But the point of it is I knew there was material that might hit the public square any moment, that would allow people to argue powerfully that there was monkey business going on–

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:But then wouldn’t– your obligation then be you get up and say, “No, there isn’t any monkey business. I know that. I’ve investigated it. I’ve appeared into it. It isn’t true”?

JAMES COMEY:Well, sure, if I could do that, given the rules of classified information, but I couldn’t. But what I could do instead is offer unusual transparency to the American people about the investigation. Tell them, “This is what we did, this is what we discovered, this is what we think about it. You possibly can trust us because we’re displaying you our work.” Again, which Department of Justice policy permits in an unusual case.

And so, it was frustrating. I’m sure it’s frustrating to Loretta Lynch that– that this material was out there. But it– to my mind, it added to the case that we need to do something unusual to offer the American people transparency. And then the capper happened at the end of June.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:Yeah, I want to get to that in one second. One final point on this. The New York Times quoted former dus– Department of Justice officials saying, “The F.B.I. by no means uncovered proof tying Ms. Lynch and the document’s writer and are satisfied that Mr. Comey needed an exers– needed an excuse to place himself in the highlight.”

JAMES COMEY:Yeah. Look, I– I understand why people say that. That’s just not true. I’m telling you how we evaluated the information. We didn’t have any reason to believe that what the document said was accurate. That is, that Loretta Lynch was a channel to the Clinton campaign and controlling us. But there’s no doubt that it would’ve allowed people to argue strongly that that was the case.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:Di– d– did you tell– Congressional officials in a classified setting that this was not true?

JAMES COMEY:That what was not true?

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:That thi– that this information was not true? That you’d investigated, looked into it and it was not– it was– it was not valid?

JAMES COMEY:Yeah, I c– I can’t say what I said in a classified setting, so let’s set that aside. I can tell you right now– we looked into it and found no evidence to support its truth.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:Third brick. The tarmac meeting.

JAMES COMEY:Yeah, the biggest brick of all. Loretta Lynch and Bill Clinton had a conversation on an F.B.I. plane which transported the attorney general in Phoenix in late June. And I didn’t pay much attention to it. I saw news accounts of it early on. And it quickly blossomed into a very big deal the last week of June.

I don’t know what they talked about. I credit Loretta Lynch ’cause I think she’s an honest person, saying, “We talked about grandchildren and different issues.” I find it hard to believe that Bill Clinton would’ve tried to obstruct justice by walking across the tarmac in front of–


JAMES COMEY:–in front of a bunch of F.B.I. agents up the s– up the stairs and onto an F.B.I. plane. And so, look, I– I credit Loretta’s account that– what they talked about. I think she’s telling the truth about that. But again, the confidence of people that the system is working in a fair way, that Lady Justice has kept her blindfold on, matters.

And so what happened the last week of June is a big storm blew up about what was going on there. And the attorney general did something that, to my mind, was strange. At the end of that week– so I think Friday, July the 1st, she put out a public statement which I didn’t know was coming, saying, “I am not going to take away myself from the investigation.” “Recuse” is the official word. “I’m not going to step outta the investigation. But I will accept Jim Comey’s suggestion and that of the career prosecutors.” And at that moment, I decided I have to step– as much as I like her, I have to step away from her and show the American people the F.B.I.’s work separately.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:Wasn’t there another route? Couldn’t you have just gone to her privately, personally and said, “You’ve got gotta recuse. You’ve got gotta get out of this utterly”?

JAMES COMEY:Maybe. But she’s my boss, one. Two, w–

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:You’ve stood up to bosses before.

JAMES COMEY:Yeah, yeah, yeah. And so that’s why there’s a two. Two, she announced publicly what she was doing before talking to me. And so I really didn’t think there was a prospect that, having announced publicly, she would accept my recommendation and that of the career prosecutors, that I would be able to convince her to recuse.

Now, what I did think about was, “Should I call for the appointment of a particular prosecutor?” Someone outside the normal chain of command who can then take our work and announce it separately from– so I don’t have to do this, can do it separately from me. And I decided that would be brutally unfair to the subject of the investigation, Hillary Clinton. And that’s not a political judgment, that’s an ethical judgment.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:No, but there’s a third route. You– you– you push her to recuse and then it goes through the normal Justice Department channels. The deputy AG, Sally Yates, makes the decision, makes the announcement?

JAMES COMEY:Sure, maybe. Maybe. And– and I– I suppose a reasonable person might have done that. But my judgment was she’s just announced publicly that she’s not going to recuse herself. And she’ll accept my recommendation that of the career prosecutors. And so what more is there to do at that point?

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:Well, you make the decision to make a public statement– July 5th. Take us inside your head. Tell us what you were thinking.

JAMES COMEY:Yeah, my goal was to try to offer as much transparency as I could, consistent with the law and policy, to the American people, with the goal of convincing them, first of all, that we’re not on anybody’s side. We’re not on the Democrat side or the Republican side. That we did this in a competent way, an honest way, an independent way.

And there’s no there, there. That no reasonable prosecutor would prosecute this case. And you can rely upon that ’cause we did this well and in an apolitical way. And so we crafted a statement that we worked on endlessly to get it right. And I decided that I would read it, say it out loud, so that people could hear the tone in my voice. But that I wouldn’t take any questions. And that was the goal, to give a report to the American people and then step away from it.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:You even thought about the tie you’d wear that day?

JAMES COMEY:I did. We’re in such– we’re still in such a vicious partisan time. I don’t know whether folks notice this, but in Washington Democrats tend to wear blue– men tend to wear blue ties. Republicans tend to wear red ties. And so I chose a gold tie that morning ’cause I didn’t want to wear either of the normal gang colors.

Which seems crazy that I have to think about that, but given the times we were operating in and we’re still in, I was hoping the American people would see us as apart from this craziness. That these are people I can trust. And part of that was not just the way I dressed. But by offering them a lot of information. Sh– let me show you my work so you can understand we did this in the way you would want us to do it.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:Your critics say you offered way too much information. The way they put it, “Pay attention, within the F.B.I. we merely do not bloody up individuals we select to not prosecute.”

JAMES COMEY:Yeah, and I get that. Look, that’s fair criticism. But here– here’s my response to it. The Department of Justice has long done that in the appropriate case, where it’s necessary to the credibility of the work. There was controversy for the first couple years of my time as director over whether the IRS had targeted Tea Party groups.

And the Department of Justice and the F.B.I. did a criminal investigation and in a detailed report that was public as to what we had done– the department did this, they criticized people but said no criminal case was warranted. This is just consistent with that practice. What I’d ask those people is would the work really have been credible if I wasn’t honest? That– that Hillary Clinton’s c– conduct on that personal email server was extremely careless. It just was. And if I wasn’t honest about that, how am I achieving the goal of showing the American people this is your justice system working in the right way?

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:Y– you– you cited her for extreme carelessness. In an original draft of your statement– the words, “Gross negligence” were there instead of “Extreme carelessness.” And– and President Trump’s allies say that’s a sign that you personally went easy on her.

JAMES COMEY:Yeah, I don’t. All these allies who think I went easy on her have a hard time explaining so why did I do what I did in October, but I’ll stay in July. I wasn’t trying to go easy on her or hard on her. I was trying to be honest and clear with the American people. What she did was really sloppy.

Not– you know, there’s all the time people mishandle a classified document or maybe have one conversation on email that they shouldn’t. This was over the course of four years, dozens of conversations on email about secret topics. And I think eight about top secret topics. So this is more than just ordinary sloppiness.

So if I’m going to be honest, I have to say somehow it’s more than ordinary sloppiness. So my first draft, which I wrote myself, said, “Gross negligence.” It’s a lawyer term. And the reason I used that term is I wanted to also explain that I don’t mean that in the sense that a statute passed 100 years ago means it. And then my staff convinced me that that’s just going to confuse all kinds of people, if you start talking about statutes and what the words mean. What’s a colloquial way to explain it? And elsewhere in my statement I had said, “Extraordinarily careless.” And so they said, “Simply use that.” And so that’s what I went with.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:And to Hillary Clinton supporters, that sounded like you’re accusing her of a crime even though you don’t prosecute.

JAMES COMEY:Yeah, I get that. And then the other said saying, “You’re admitting she dedicated a criminal offense, you did not prosecute her.” The goal was– and– and one of the mistakes I made is I don’t know what it would be. I should’ve worked harder to find a way to convey that it’s more than just the ordinary mistake, but it’s not criminal behavior, and find different words to– to describe that.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:Even your family had some criticism of that press conference?

JAMES COMEY:Yeah, they did. They did. God love them, they have criticism of nearly every press conference. But this one, their feedback was, “You Seacrested it, Dad,” which I– they explained to me was a reference to Ryan Seacrest, the TV host, who I guess will frequently say– he’s about to announce a result and then say, “But first, this business.” And what they meant was I made people wait till the very end to say what the conclusion was we were reaching, when folks wanted to hear that at the beginning.

And I actually think that’s fair feedback. And I– I think that’s an example of my ego sneaking through. That– that I thought I knew the best way to present this was not to give them the headline up front ’cause I thought then they won’t listen to the rest of it–

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:You wanted people to listen.

JAMES COMEY:Yeah. But– I think I was wrong about that. In fact, I know I was wrong about that ’cause it led to a lotta confusion. “Where is he going?” And people thinking that I was somehow burying the lead for dramatic purposes or– or something. So that feedback from my family, as usually is, was accurate.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:And you also would not use the words, “Excessive carelessness” today?

JAMES COMEY:No. I’d find some– I don’t know what it would be, sitting here. Find some other way to convey, ’cause I wanted to be honest and transparent. This wasn’t your ordinary bureaucrat who just mishandles one document. This was something more than that. But not something that anybody would prosecute.

And– and that’s one of the things about the criticism that drives me crazy. Nobody who has done counterespionage work would think this is a case that’s been prosecute– would be prosecuted, ever. And so I needed to find a way to both convey that and to capture that it was more than just ordinary carelessness.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:But do you think that the F.B.I. would be in better shape today, the institution you love, would be in better shape today if you had simply put out that one line statement, “We decline to prosecute”?

JAMES COMEY:I don’t know. I’ve asked myself that a million times. It’s hard– hindsight is a wonderful thing. I’m not sure that it would have. And– here’s why I say that. Because we would’ve taken a tremendous amount of criticism for being fixed. The system fixed, no detail. And I still would’ve been dragged up to Capitol Hill all that summer to justify the F.B.I.’s work.

And so surely, I would’ve said something about how we did the work. And so I– I’d kinda be in the same place, except I’d be playing defense like a cornerback backpedaling. There’d be this tremendous hit the institution would take. I’d be trying to explain to people, “No, no, we did it in a great way. We did it in a good way.” And none of it, by the way, would change what I faced in late October. Even if we’d just done the one liner, we’d still have the nightmare of late October.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:Y– you laid out a series of reasons that led you to do– do the July press conference– even going back to Loretta Lynch calling this a matter not an investigation. President Obama weighing in. The classified information about Loretta Lynch, the tarmac meeting. Can you assure people today– can you assure them that the Obama Justice Department was not protecting Hillary Clinton?

JAMES COMEY:Yes. And if there were people who were secretly trying to protect Hillary Clinton, we didn’t know about it. The FBI drove this investigation and we did it in a competent and independent way. I would bet my life on that.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:While this is all going on in July of 2016, the FBI also opens an investigation into the Trump campaign. Why?

JAMES COMEY:Well– to be more clear, we opened an investigation into whether there were any Americans associated in any way with the Trump campaign who were working with Russia as part of Russia’s effort to influence our election. And so in late July, the FBI got information that there was somebody who had had– was a foreign policy advisor named Papadopoulos to the Trump campaign.


JAMES COMEY:Right, who had been talking to someone in London about getting dirt that the Russians had on Hillary Clinton as part of their effort to influence our campaign– the– our election. And the reason that was important was that was long before the– there was any public indication that the Russians had material they were going to dump, which they started dumping in mid-June.

And so we opened, our counterintelligence division, in late July, an investigation to try and figure out– we know the Russians are trying to mess with our election. Are any Americans working with them, trying to help them?

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:You also had had your eye on Carter Page, who had also been working with the Trump campaign.


GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:And what was your concern there?

JAMES COMEY:Similarly, trying to figure out is he in any way coordinating with the Russians, as part of their effort to influence our– our election? We hear the word “collusion” all the time. “Collusion” is not a word that’s familiar to me from my work. The question is, is anybody conspiring or aiding and abetting, helping, the Russians accomplish their goal of interfering in the American election? That’s what the counterintelligence investigation was about.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:S– so what impact did the Steele– the so-called Steele dossier have on the FBI investigation? Did that trigger the FBI investigation in any way?

JAMES COMEY:No. No, in fact, as I said, the information that triggered it was the Papadopoulos information that came in late July. The FBI didn’t get any information that’s part of the so-called Steele dossier, as I understand it, until after that. And so the investigation was triggered entirely separately from the Steele dossier.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:So the FBI is investigating Russian interference in our campaign, and whether or not any individuals associated with President Trump are cooperating with that interference. What are you thinking then? As you see President Trump invite the Russians to release Hillary Clinton’s emails, as you see him refuse to criticize Vladimir Putin?

JAMES COMEY:I’m thinking the questions that we’re asking ourselves, which is, is anybody– is the Trump campaign in any way working directly with the Russians? Is there– because the– the fact that the president is calling for the release of the emails could cut both ways.

You could argue it’s an indication that they don’t have a secret channel with the Russians, or you could argue it means they’re in bed with the Russians and there must be connections that we can find. And so it was obviously of interest to us, but we already had the investigation underway.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:And the refusal to criticize Vladimir Putin?

JAMES COMEY:I don’t know what’s behind that. I mean, that’s– that mystified me even after President Trump became president ’cause I discovered that he wouldn’t criticize him even in private, which– I can understand a president making a geopolitical decision that, “I ought not to criticize an adversary country’s chief for some cause publicly.” But I discovered President Trump wouldn’t even do it privately, and I don’t know why that is.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:You first were briefed on the Steele dossier in August of 2015. What did you make of it?

JAMES COMEY:That it, at its core, was consistent with the other information we’d gathered during the intelligence investigation. That there was a massive Russian effort underway to interfere with our election with three goals: to dirty up the American democracy so it’s not a shining light for others around the world; to hurt Hillary Clinton, who Vladimir Putin personally hated; and to help Donald Trump become elected president.

Th– those allegations are at the core of the Steele dossier, and we already knew that was true from totally separate information. And so at its core, it said something that was consistent with what we believed. It was coming from a credible source, someone with a track record, someone who was a credible and respected member of an allied intelligence service during his career. And so it was important that we try to understand it, and see what could we verify, what could we rule in or rule out?

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:Did you think it was a credible document?

JAMES COMEY:Well, certainly the source was credible. There’s no doubt that he had a network of sources and sub-sources in a position to report on these kinds of things. But we tend to approach these things with a bit of a blank slate, trying to figure out, “So what can we replicate?” This guy, who’s credible, says these things are true. Okay. That means we should try and replicate that work to see if we can develop the same sources.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:A– and at the time, did you know it had been financed at the beginning from President Trump’s– by President Trump’s political opponents?

JAMES COMEY:Yes, I– I was told at some point that it was– the effort had originally been financed by a Republican source to develop– material– opposition research on Donald Trump. Then after the Republican nominating process ended, the effort was taken up and funded by a Democratic aligned group trying to get opposition research on Trump. I never knew which– who the groups were, but I knew it started with Republicans paying for it and then Democrats were paying for it.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:And– and all through August and September– there’s a great debate going on inside the Obama administration: What to reveal about Russia (SIC) was doing, what to reveal about your investigation. Describe that.

JAMES COMEY:Yeah. Not the second part. Y– actually was not a hard question about whether to talk publicly about the fact that we’d opened in– counterintelligence investigations on a small number of Americans because it was far too early. We didn’t know what we had, and we didn’t want to tip them off that we were looking at them.

So consistent with our policy– again, very different than the Hillary Clinton case, which began with a public referral. Everybody knew we were looking at her emails. So when we confirmed it three months later, there’s no jeopardy at all to the investigation.

This was very different. We did not want these Americans to know that we had reason to believe they might be working with the Russians ’cause we gotta run this down and investigate it. So actually what was debated was a different and harder question which is what should we tell the American people about the fact that the Russians are messing with our election?

Trying to hurt our democracy, hurt Hillary Clinton and help Donald Trump. What should we do about that? And one of the options debated was should we inoculate the American people in some way by telling them, “The Russians try to mess with you. You must know that so you’ll be able to take that under consideration if you see news or see specific approaches to things.”

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:W– we– we know that– there were s– there were strong objections in– by Republicans in the Senate to being public about this. But at one point, you actually volunteered to put it all on paper?

JAMES COMEY:Yeah– I think it was in August, I volunteered that– that I would be– I remember saying that I’m a little bit tired of being the independent voice on things, after the beating I’d taken after the July 5th announcement. But I said in a meeting with the president, “I’m prepared to be the voice on this and assist inoculate the American individuals.

However I also acknowledge why this is such a tough question, as a result of in case you announce that the Russians try to mess with our election, do you accomplish their objective for them? Do you undermine confidence in our election by having the president of the USA, or considered one of his senior individuals, say this publicly?

Will the Russians be glad that you simply did that?” And so I– I wrote an op-ed, was going to go in a major newspaper that laid out what was going on. Not the investigation, ’cause that was too sensitive to reveal, but that, “The Russians are here they usually’re screwing with us. And that is consistent with what they’ve accomplished up to now,” and they never took me up on it. The Obama administration deliberated until the beginning of October.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:And– and one of the things you write that was influencing the president and his administration was the assumption that Hillary Clinton would win.

JAMES COMEY:I think so. In fact, I heard the president say, as– as I recount in the book, “Putin backed the improper horse.” That is, all of us were operating in a world where the polls were showing that Donald Trump had no chance. So I think what the president meant by that was the Russian effort is wasted, and so why should we help them by announcing what they’re doing when their work is not going to achieve their goal?

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:And it would give people reason to question the outcome of the election.

JAMES COMEY:Right. Donald Trump was already saying, “If I lose, meaning the system is rigged.” And so if the Obama administration comes out saying, “The Russians try to help elect Donald Trump,” that walks right into his narrative that’s, “See, I informed ya,” that the whole system is fixed and you can’t trust the American democratic process. And the Russians would have accomplished their goal.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:Eventually the– administration does announce– that they’ve found that Russia is interfering– yet, and this is– this confounds me. I– I’m– I’m puzzled by this. Yet, when they decide to come out with a joint statement of the intelligence committees, you as the FBI director refused to sign it. Why?

JAMES COMEY:Because of the way we approach action in the run-up to an election. The– it’s not written down, despite what you might have heard, but there’s an important norm that I’ve lived my whole government career– obeying. If you can avoid it, you should not take any action in the run-up to an election that could have an impact on the election.

By that, I mean the FBI or the Department of Justice. And so we were being asked, in October, to sign onto a statement that says, “The Russians are messing with our election.” In my view and the view of the FBI leadership was it’s too late. And we can avoid action here.

Because the goal’s already been accomplished. The American people already know this because lots of government officials have been on background talking to the press about this, members of Congress have been talking about it, the candidates are talking about it. So the inoculation has already been achieved, and it’s October. So we can avoid action here consistent with our policy that, whenever possible, we try and avoid action. So we won’t sign this.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:But doesn’t that undercut the weight of the statement?

JAMES COMEY:I don’t think so. I mean, coming from the director of National Intelligence, I don’t think anybody noticed at the time that the FBI wasn’t on the statement. It was the secondly of Homeland Security, and the director of National Intelligence, my boss. I reported to the attorney general and the director of National Intelligence.

And so I don’t think it un– undercut the statement. But it allowed us to be consistent with our standard which is, if possible, we should avoid action in the run-up to an election that might have an impact. Here, it is possible because the goal’s been achieved already.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:Did anybody try to convince you to sign it?

JAMES COMEY:I think I was asked to sign it– by the director of National Intelligence, Jim Clapper. And I think I explained why– I thought the FBI shouldn’t sign up at this point. I don’t remember any pushback on that.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:At the same time, the Hillary Clinton email investigation comes back. When did you first know you were going to have to deal with this again?

JAMES COMEY:Really, October 27th. Somebody earlier in October, the b– in the beginning of October sometime, mentioned to me that there may be a connection between emails found on Anthony Weiner’s laptop and the Clinton email investigation. I don’t remember.


JAMES COMEY:I think it was Andy McCabe, but I’m not certain. I didn’t store that in any prominent place in my brain ’cause how could that possibly be true?

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:But how could that not be something you remember?

JAMES COMEY:That’s a great question. I think the answer is because how could that possibly be true? How could there be a connection between Anthony Weiner’s laptop and Hillary Clinton’s emails? And so I think it was sort of a passing comment to me, and I’m sure I stored it away thinking, “Okay, properly, that doesn’t make any sense, but I am positive they will inform me if it does.” And they did. They c–

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:It’s l– it’s led your critics to say that the FBI, for several weeks, sat on the knowledge that they had several thousand Hillary Clinton emails.

JAMES COMEY:Yeah, more than several thousand, hundreds–

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:Hundreds of thousands.

JAMES COMEY:–of thousands on Anthony Weiner’s laptop. And I don’t know the answer to that criticism. I don’t know whether the Bureau team could have moved faster to– to bring it to me for a decision. All I know is that they did bring it to me on the morning of October 27th. And so, there’s an inspector general investigation going on– about our work on that investigation. I’m sure they’ll say, which I think is great. But I don’t know the answer to that now–

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:So th– and– and– and– and to be clear, between that first mention and October 27th, you didn’t hear anything about Hillary Clinton’s–

JAMES COMEY:Yeah, I don’t–


JAMES COMEY:–remember hearing anything else about it until I walked into a conference room early in the morning on October 27th. So we’re now less than two weeks from the election. The deputy director emailed me at about 5:30 in the morning and said, “The midyear workforce,” which was the code name for the Clinton email investigation, “needs to satisfy with you.”

And it’s unusual to email me at 5:30 in the morning. And so I m– arranged to meet with the team. And I walked in with a stupid smile on my face, I think, and said, “The band is back collectively.” ‘Cause they were sitting in the same seats they’d sat in so many times.

And I didn’t smile again for a long time like that– after that. And what they told me was, “We’ve found, for causes we will not explain, tons of of hundreds of Hillary Clinton’s emails on Anthony Weiner’s laptop. And one thing rather more essential than that. Hundreds of emails from Hillary Clinton’s Blackberry area.”

She used a Blackberry for the first three months or so of her tenure as secretary of State before setting up the personal server in the basement. And the reason that matters so much is, if there was gonna be a smoking gun, where Hillary Clinton was told, “Don’t do this,” or, “That is improper,” it’s highly likely to be at the beginning.

And we never found those emails. And so now they’re telling me, “For causes we will not clarify, hundreds of these Blackberry emails are on Anthony Weiner’s laptop computer.” And so I said, “Okay. We gotta go get ’em. How fast are you able to evaluation these?” And the answer was, “We will not probably end before the election as a result of we’ve to read tens of hundreds of emails.

We will not ask recruits to return in and evaluate them because you must know the context.” And so I’m sitting there on the morning of October 27th, they’re telling me there’s material that may change the conclusion in this case. We all agree, including the Department of Justice, we’ve gotta get a search warrant to go get these.

And then the question for me now is, “So what can we do now?” Remember the– the standard is, the norm is, “When you can keep away from it, you’re taking no action which may have an impact on an election.” And I’m sitting there, on the morning of October 27th, and I can’t see a door that’s labeled, “No motion here.” I can only see two doors, and they’re both actions. One says, “Converse,” the other says, “Conceal”–

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:Well, no. You– you c– you could you f– try to find out first whether or not they were indeed relevant. Whether they– there was evidence there of a crime.

JAMES COMEY:Well, maybe. And maybe another director might have done that. My view is that would be a potentially deeply irresponsible and dangerous thing to do, to gamble– remember, the team is telling you, “We can’t evaluate this materials earlier than the election.”

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:But we don’t know what’s in it?

JAMES COMEY:Well, we know there are hundreds of thousands of Hillary Clinton’s emails there, including Blackberry emails. And so there is reason to believe that this is evidence in our case, and may change the result. And so maybe what you do is gamble and say, “I’ll be quiet about it,” but that comes back to my doors.

That’s an affirmative act of concealment, right? Because I’ve told Congress and the American people– the whole point of July 5th was transparency. “Look, American individuals, what we’ve achieved. We did it rigorously, we did it properly. There isn’t any there there.

You’ll be able to take that to the financial institution. You possibly can rely on the FBI. We’re achieved. Everyone can get on with their lives.” It’s October 27th, that’s not true anymore, in potentially a huge way. So you could speak about it, or you could not speak about it. But the not speaking about it is an action.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:Senior Justice officials weren’t convinced that you actually had an obligation to tell Congress that at that time. What was their argument, what was your response?

JAMES COMEY:Their argument was that it was not consistent with our policy, and that we don’t normally comment on investigations, all of which I agree with. And that they would advise against it. Actually never spoke to me about it personally. I had my chief of staff call over to the leadership’s chief of s– staffs of th– the attorney general and the deputy and say, “The director thinks that is between speaking and concealing.

Speaking is actually dangerous; concealing is catastrophic. In the event you conceal the truth that you’ve gotten restarted the Hillary Clinton e mail investigation, not in some silly method but in a very, essential method which will result in a special conclusion, what is going to happen to the institutions of justice when that comes out?

Especially, given the world we’re working in, when Hillary Clinton’s elected president? She’ll be an illegitimate president, however these organizations will never get well from that. You hid from the American individuals one thing you knew gave the mislead what you informed them in Congress repeatedly. And so the director thinks that we’ve got to speak. And he can be pleased to speak to you about it. Let him know.”

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:Even though you didn’t know what was in– what was in those emails, you could have predicted what President Trump and his allies would do with it once you released this information. It’s exactly what happened. Everyone says, “This have to be vital. This have to be actual.”

JAMES COMEY:Yeah, I totally get that, and– which is why we worked so hard. And although they didn’t want to talk to me about the decision, the leadership of the Department of Justice did give input on what I should say to Congress. And the goal was to say as little as possible, because we didn’t know, “Is that this going to vary our end result or not?”

But j– of course I know what’s going to happen. It’s going to be distorted one way, just as if it– when the later thing came out, it would be distorted the other way.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:That concern, when it dealt with the classified information about Loretta Lynch, something you didn’t believe but were worried about how it would be used, didn’t seem to affect you here. Here you know that President Trump is going to say– that candidate Trump at the time is going to say, “This proves every little thing I’ve been saying about Hillary Clinton is true.”

JAMES COMEY:Yeah. And the question is so what do I do? Given that that’s going to happen, what do I do? Does– does that mean I conceal? And my judgment, and reasonable people can disagree about this– my point is not to tell people– “You must consider I’m proper.” But I want people to know where the decision came from. That’s between speaking and concealing. It would destroy the Department of Justice and the FBI to conceal that information from the American people.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:That’s the judgment you made. Boy, you seem to be alone in that judgment. You look at previous attorney generals for President Bush, for President Ford, for President Obama, Justice Department officials for President Clinton; they all disagree with you. They say this crossed a line.

JAMES COMEY:Yeah, I’ve– I’ve heard a lot of that. And in fact, all that was put together allegedly to be the reason for my firing. What I would hope is that they would, by reading the book, come with me to October 28th. Come with me, and sit there with me.

Not knowing the future. And sit there with me, look at the doors I looked at, and tell me then what you would do. Tell me which you would pick? And th– that’s what I would, in my mind’s eye, scream at the television. I wouldn’t scream at the television, but I’d say, “Inform me what you’d do. Tell me which door you’d decide.”

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:They have a pretty clear answer. You say you don’t break with longstanding Justice Department norms, you don’t reveal information like this?

JAMES COMEY:Yeah. Okay. And so that means– and first of all, the Justice Department norms allow you, in appropriate cases, to comment on an investigation, to comment on the facts you found in an investigation, all the things we talk–

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:But there’s no– there’s– there’s no precedent for– putting out information like this at the end of a campaign?

JAMES COMEY:Oh, I’ve never heard of it before. I– I– as I say in the book, I– I think I did it the way that it should have been done. I’m– I’m not certain of that. Other people might have had a different view. I pray to God no future FBI director ever has to find out.

I– I hope so much this is just a 500-year flood we never see again. We have the FBI’s criminally investigating one of the two candidates for president of the United States during the campaign. And– and just over a week before the election, we find on Anthony Weiner’s laptop– and by the way, I– I know this is obvious, but I didn’t put the emails on Anthony Weiner’s laptop.

Right? I would so much rather Anthony Weiner had never had a laptop. I’d rather never have heard about this situation. But a week or so before the election, we find material on Anthony Weiner’s laptop that may change the result, including the missing Blackberry emails.

My question for all those op-ed pieces is, “So what do you do?” And maybe you would choose conceal, but you gotta explain to me why and how you think ab– again, not with the benefit of hindsight. But how you think about the damage to the institutions–

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:We just don’t get involved two weeks before an election.

JAMES COMEY:Right. To my mind, that is a narrow way to answer that question without considering the damage to the institutions you lead. I mean, “We do not become involved.” We get involved if it is the least bad option, right? That’s a terrible option, to speak. It made me sick to my stomach to speak.

I’ve devoted my life in government to institutions that have no impact on elections. Speaking is going to have some impact, potentially. But concealing is going to destroy the institutions that I love.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:Hillary Clinton’s convinced that that letter defeated her. What do you say to her?

JAMES COMEY:I hope not. I– I don’t know. I honestly don’t know. I sure hope not. But– the honest answer is, it wouldn’t change the way I think about it. I mean, my hope– I didn’t write the book for this reason. But talking about leadership, it was important to tell the email story because it’s me trying to figure out how to lead well.

That people will read that story and try to put themselves in my shoes. Try to realize that I’m not trying to help a candidate or hurt a candidate; I’m trying to do the right thing. And you can come up with different conclusions. Reasonable people woulda chosen a different door for reasonable reasons. But it’s just not fair to say we were doing it for some illegitimate reason.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:If you knew that letter would elect Donald Trump, you’d still send it?

JAMES COMEY:I would. I would. In fact, that was a question asked by one of my best people– a deputy general counsel in the FBI who is a very thoughtful and quiet person, who didn’t speak a lot. And that– that morning we were making that decision, she asked, “Do you have to think about that what you are about do to might assist elect Donald Trump president?”

And I paused, and then I said, “Thanks for asking that question. That’s an amazing question. But the reply shouldn’t be for a moment because down that path lies the dying of the FBI as an unbiased drive in American life. If I ever get thinking about whose political fortunes shall be affected by a choice, we’re completed. We’re not that group in America that is aside from the partisans, and that may be trusted. We’re just another participant in the– within the tribal battle.”

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:But– but at some level, wasn’t the decision to reveal influenced by your assumption that Hillary Clinton was going to win? And your concern that she wins, this comes out several weeks later, and then that’s taken by her opponent as a sign that she’s an illegitimate president?

JAMES COMEY:It must have been. I don’t remember consciously thinking about that, but it must have been. ‘Cause I was operating in a world where Hillary Clinton was going to beat Donald Trump. And so I’m sure that it– that it was a factor. Like I said, I don’t remember spelling it out, but it had to have been. That– that she’s going to be elected president, and if I hide this from the American people, she’ll be illegitimate the moment she’s elected, the moment this comes out.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:An– and doesn’t that also explain, at some level, your decision to conceal the fact that you’re investigating the Trump campaign for possible ties to Russia? You conceal it so you don’t give him an excuse to say, “Hey, this thing is rigged.”

JAMES COMEY:Well, no. Not with respect to the counterintelligence investigation of those small number of Americans. That– that was actually not a hard call, given the sensitivity of the matter and that it was ongoing. We didn’t want to tip anybody off. What– you’re right though, with respect to the decision by President Obama, as to how to talk about the Russian interference with the American people.

I think it was– I mean, he said it to me– in that meeting I described, “Putin backed the incorrect horse.” He was clearly thinking, “I do not need to, provided that Trump’s going to lose, be– seem like I’m putting my finger on the size.”

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:You’ve said that a few times now. You think it’s not a close call. Boy, your critics say this is a clear, clear, clear double standard. You revealed information about Hillary Clinton; you concealed information about Donald Trump. That elected Donald Trump.

JAMES COMEY:Yeah, I get that. I get that– why they say that. But what I’d ask them to do is take a step back and stare at the two cases and the posture they were in. The Hillary Clinton email case, which began with a public referral, and so was public, th– and we were actually investigating the candidate herself; and the counterintelligence investigations trying to figure out whether a small group of people, not Donald Trump– we were not investigating Donald Trump.

Whether this small group of Americans was coordinating anything with the Russians. We had just started the investigation. Didn’t know whether we had anything. So it would have been brutally unfair to those people to talk about it. And it woulda jeopardized the investigation.

As I said, the Department wouldn’t agree to talk about that, and only in a general way, until the following March. So I hope those critics– I get the initial reaction. It seems inconsistent. But if you take the time and look at the posture of the two cases, they’re very, very different. And actually illustrate the rule that we’re following.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:If Attorney General Lynch had ordered you not to send the letter, would you have sent it?



JAMES COMEY:No way. I– I believe in the chain of command. I followed her instruction to call it a “matter,” because she told me to call it a “matter.” And I didn’t believe it was unethical or illegal. And so, yes, I would have followed their instruction.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:Why do you think they didn’t order you not to send it?

JAMES COMEY:I don’t know. I don’t know. Part of me thinks– given an encounter I had with Loretta after I sent it, that she may have understood what I was doing. And– and so didn’t want to be involved in the decision, didn’t want to approve it, but didn’t want to give me the instruction not to send it. Sorta let me take the hit for that. And I could be wrong about that, but– but I think that’s consistent with– with– an encounter I had with her privately.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:What did it feel like to be James Comey in the last ten days of that campaign after ya sent the letter?

JAMES COMEY:It sucked. Yeah, it was– it was a very painful period. Again, my whole life has been dedicated to institutions that work not to have an involvement in an election. I walked around vaguely sick to my stomach, feeling beaten down. I felt, when I went to the White House– I don’t want to spoil it for people, but there’s a movie called “The Sixth Sense” that I talk about in the book where Bruce Willis doesn’t realize he’s dead.

That’s the way I felt. I felt like I was totally alone, that everybody hated me. And that there wasn’t a way out because it really was the right thing to do. And that– that, in a way, I’m ruined. But that’s what I have to do. I had to do it the way.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:And during that time, you actually talked about this encounter with Loretta Lynch.

JAMES COMEY:Yeah, the Monday I sent the letter– I learn about the emails, get briefed on the need for a search warrant on the 27th of October. We debated and debated and debated and decide on the 28th to send the letter. We had a regular meeting with Loretta on Monday, so that woulda been the 31st.

And she emailed me the Sunday night before and said, “Hey, can I meet with you after our regular terrorism menace briefing on Monday morning?” Said, “Positive.” And at the end of the meeting, she asked could she meet with me? Which of course we’d al– I’d already agreed to meet.

But our staffs were all there, and so they then knew the two of us were going to meet. And they all waited outside. And Loretta took me into an office in the FBI that’s reserved for the attorney general, and I walked in first, and she walked in and closed the door and then turned and just walked towards me with her head down and her arms out.

And I’m not a big hugger, but especially– there was an awkward dis– difference in our height, I guess as there is with me and most people. But she pressed her face against my chest and wrapped her arms around me and then I reached down, as I explain in the book, and kinda awkwardly hugged.

And then we– parted and she said, “I– I assumed you needed a hug.” And she was right. I’m sure it showed on my face how beaten I felt. And then we sat down and she said, “How are you doing?” Loretta Lynch is a really good person and has known me a long time.

She said, “How are you doing?” And I told her that I felt terrible, that I felt beaten, and– but that I didn’t see that I had a choice. And then she said something that floored me. She said, “Would they feel better if it leaked on November the 4th?” And my reaction was– and I said to her, “Precisely, Loretta.”

And so, I don’t know, was she telling me, “You’ve got finished the appropriate thing?” And, in a way, hugging me because she feels badly I’ve taken this incredibly brutal hit? I don’t know. But I interpreted that as, “To start with, I really feel badly for you. And even in case you hadn’t made this determination, when you start going to get a search warrant for Anthony Weiner’s laptop to take a look at a whole lot of hundreds of Hillary Clinton emails, it is more likely to leak out anyway,” she’s telling me.

And remember, the Department of Justice had thought, “We gotta go get a search warrant,” in the week before the election. And so that’s how I took it. Again, I– I could be wrong about that, but that’s how I took it.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:One of the reasons it was– you feared it was going to leak out is– ’cause you were dealing with a rogue element of FBI agents and former FBI agents up in New York who were really pushing to get this out there. Were you aware of that?

JAMES COMEY:I knew that there were leaks coming– or appeared to be leaks about criminal investigation of the Clintons coming out of New York. And I don’t know exactly where that was coming from. I commissioned an investigation to find out. I don’t know what the investigation found.

But, yeah, I was worried about– the– the team that had done the investigation was in the counterintelligence division at headquarters, of the emails. And there were no leaks at all, very tight. But the criminal folks in New York were now involved in a major way, and I don’t want to single anybody out ’cause I don’t know where it was coming from.

But there’d been enough up there that I thought there was a pretty reasonable likelihood that it would leak, and that’s what Loretta was reflecting.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:You had your– your former boss, Rudy Giuliani, out there on television saying something big was coming.

JAMES COMEY:Yes, I saw that. And I don’t know whether that was– it’s part of what I ordered investigated. I don’t know whether that was part of a leak outta the– FBI office in New York that knew about the search warrant. But that was my concern, that once you start seeking a search warrant, especially in a criminal case– counterintelligence is different.

They’re so used to operating in a classified environment. They’re much tighter. But once you start involving people whose tradition is criminal, and in New York which has a different culture, there is a reasonable likelihood it was going to get out anyway.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:So were you gamed here by people who had political motives?

JAMES COMEY:I don’t think so. I mean, I– I don’t think anybody with political motives put hundreds of thousands of Hillary Clinton’s emails on Anthony Weiner’s laptop, for heaven sakes. And so I– I don’t think so.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:Is one of the lessons here that, as hard as you tried to stay outta politics, it actually is unavoidable? That because you have to make political assumptions as ya– as– as you’re closing in on an election, you’re thrown into politics no matter which decision you make?

JAMES COMEY:Oh, I think that’s right. And that– that wasn’t a new lesson. That was why Mark Giuliani said at the beginning, “You realize you are totally screwed.” The FBI’s an independent organization, but it’s operating in a very, very difficult partisan environment in the United States.

And investigating one of the two candidates for president of the United States. That’s what he meant, “You’re completely screwed.” And– one of my kids– I stayed off Twitter during that period of time. One of my kids shared with me a tweet that’s become one of my favorites where someone said, “That Comey is such a political hack.

I simply cannot work out which social gathering.” And I took that as a compliment, but also an illustration of what I’m talking about. You’re the FBI, you’re supposed to be finding the facts. And you’re finding the facts in a world where everybody’s on a side, and can’t possibly understand you’re not on a side. And so you’re inevitably going to get hammered from all points, and you’re going to be involved in politics in some sense, because you’re in the middle of it–


JAMES COMEY:–trying to find out what’s true.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:–lead to the conclusion do what you’re going to do, don’t talk about it?

JAMES COMEY:Yes, except that you’re an institution that depends upon public trust. And so, again, those people who say, “It is best to have simply closed the Clinton investigation without saying a phrase about it,” I don’t think you’re thinking about the public trust in the institutions of justice, and the damage that would have done to people’s faith and trust that the justice system is working.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:But hasn’t the public–

JAMES COMEY:It’s the reason that you talk about cases– again, cases of great interest you talk about all the time. It was really important that the Department of Justice put out a report about what happened in Ferguson, Missouri. An 80-some-page report.

Now, they could have said, “We do not speak about our investigations,” but folks wanted to know what happened in Ferguson, Missouri? For reasons I totally understand. And when you’re the Justice Department, you’ve got to tell people, when you can, “This was carried out in the fitting method, and this is what you need to know–

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:But aren’t you involved that that public trust has taken successful due to the choices you made?

JAMES COMEY:Oh, in fact I’m. Yeah, I’ve considered it so much. And I used to be going to say one million occasions. In all probability have not considered it one million occasions, perhaps a thousand or extra, and requested myself, “So should I have done something differently?” And I feel it is truthful to say any person else in my footwear may need carried out something in another way.

The trustworthy answer is I screwed up a few issues, however in the primary, I feel given what I knew at the time, these have been the choices that have been greatest calculated to preserve the values of the establishments. It was terrible for me, horrible. However I nonetheless assume it was the appropriate thing to do.

And my hope on this ebook is, not that folks agree with me, y– they could still walk outta this considering I’m an idiot, however I am an trustworthy idiot. And I actually was deliberative, and did not do this alone. I had a staff of very shiny people who argued and fought and debated making an attempt to determine, “So what’s the right thing to do?”

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:Your basic counsel, I consider, thought you should not release the letter, right?

JAMES COMEY:No. There was o– there was one senior government who thought we shouldn’t ship the second letter, November the 8th, saying, “We have finished looking at these emails and it doesn’t change our result.” But aside from that– I imply, we debated a ton of various choices. The senior group of the FBI, including the overall counsel, thought we have now to.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:Election Day 2016. You didn’t vote.



JAMES COMEY:I am the director of the FBI. I am making an attempt to be outdoors of politics so intentionally tried not to comply with it lots. And that I shouldn’t be choosing between the candidates. I am making an attempt to steer an institution that must be separate and different.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:Have been– have been you aware– you say you attempt not to comply with it, but you will need to have been conscious of– what the candidates have been saying concerning the letter in these last ten days.

JAMES COMEY:Yes, I was. Yeah. Because, once more, I am leading an institution that public belief and confidence in that institution actually issues. So I attempt to hold monitor of, “So what are– what are folks saying about us and how we’re conducting ourselves?” ‘Cause regardless that I used to be raised not to care what other individuals assume, whenever you’re the director of the FBI or the lawyer basic, it’s a must to when it pertains to the establishment you lead.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:And take us by way of that day. Where have been you because the returns have been coming in?

JAMES COMEY:I do not even keep in mind. I feel I used to be residence that day. Yeah, I feel I was residence that day, that night time. ‘Trigger I feel it was a reasonably late evening. And I was stunned that Donald Trump was elected president, as I feel most– perhaps Donald Trump was too, but as– as an entire lotta individuals have been.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:And what a part of you is considering, “I helped elect Donald Trump”?

JAMES COMEY:Nicely, no part of me, ’cause I don’t know the reply to that. But an entire lot of me was considering, “Oh my God, did we have some role in this? Did we have some impact on the election?” And it’s an incredibly painful juxtaposition, but in addition considering, “I really wouldn’t-a done it any differently.

God, I hope we had no impact. I hope we had no impact.” Nevertheless it– I do know– I worry it sounds boastful to say, however it– it wouldn’t change the end result. It just makes it extra painful to assume that we’d have had an–


JAMES COMEY:–impact on the–


JAMES COMEY:It would not. I– even if I had a time machine, I can not go back in time and as director of the FBI say, “I’m going to make this decision because I don’t think Donald Trump will be a good president of the United States.” That’s not the FBI’s position. And so I’m gl– I am glad for a lotta reasons I don’t have a time machine, but that’s what I mean once I say it doesn’t– it does not change the outcome.

We– we tried to, and I consider did, make these selections with out regard to political Russia. With out regard to how it will have an effect on and who it might affect, based mostly on, “So what’s the right thing to do? Should we speak, or should we conceal? And given the values and traditions of the institutions of justice, which is the right thing to do?”

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:You stated you hoped it did not change the outcome, but what does your gut inform you?

JAMES COMEY:I actually do not know. I’ve read a good amount, ’cause– ’cause I am– again, I hope very a lot. I might like to have a gaggle of teachers establish it had absolutely no impression on the election. I’ve read individuals argue that it had. I do not know.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:Nate Silver has a reasonably persuasive– evaluation that means it made a huge distinction.

JAMES COMEY:Yeah, I– again, I do not know the reply. And in a method, I care concerning the reply, and in a method it does not matter in any respect.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:And– just take us inside your home at that time. You– you’ve got written about this. Your wife, Patrice, Hillary Clinton supporter.

JAMES COMEY:Oh yeah. And– and the– the– I didn’t take a poll among all the youngsters, but I’m fairly positive that at the least my four daughters, in all probability all 5 of my youngsters, needed Hillary Clinton to be the first lady president. I know my superb partner did. My)– my wife and women marched within the ladies’s march the day after President Trump’s inauguration.

There was a lotta passion in this house for Hillary Clinton. And I– I get that. However again, I hope it illustrates to folks that I really wasn’t making selections based mostly on political fortunes.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:S– so what did she say to you? What did you say to her?

JAMES COMEY:Yeah, I don’t– I– she knew sufficient, Patrice, the ache that I used to be in that– and the way exhausting these selections have been that I don’t assume she spent a lotta time– I feel she acquired truly where I used to be. I d– she did not spend– she expressed frustration.

She hated the fact that I had to make these selections, and ’cause she loves me dearly, she hated the truth that I personally was stepping in entrance of the institutions to get shot repeatedly. She would say, “Look, I get what you’re doing. I get that you’re trying to protect the institutions.

But why does it have to be you? Why do you have to be the one that everyone’s going to hate?” And my answer was– “‘Cause I’m stuck. I would rather not.” Like I stated, I might moderately Hillary Clinton have used the State Division for her e mail system. I might relatively that Anthony Weiner have not had a laptop in any respect.

I might relatively have had– I’ve still never met Hillary Clinton; I might quite never have been involved. However what am I going to do? We have been concerned. The inspector common sent us a referral, we needed to open a case, and we have been completely screwed.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:If she have been sitting proper right here at the moment, what would you inform her?

JAMES COMEY:Hillary Clinton? I– I understand it seems like I am pumping my ebook, “I hope you’ll read those chapters of the book. Not so that you walk away agreeing with my decisions, but that you understand better where they came from. And– and frankly, the kinda person who was trying to make those decisions.

Even you think they’re wrong, that look at how we made those decisions and why.” And I– I feel– look, I have never talked about this. I’ve gotten the daylights beat outta me– this is the primary time I’ve talked about this. And I’m positive an entire lotta individuals have a view of me based mostly on that.

And what I might ask them to do is please try to come into these rooms. Read the guide and are available into these rooms and see how we tried to make these selections. And if potential, ask yourselves, “What would I have done, and why?” And you might come out considering, “I’dve done it differently,” but I do not assume you will come out considering that– as Hillary Clinton wrote in her ebook, I shived her.

I mean, that feels like I was making an attempt to knife any person, I used to be out to get her. And it’s illustration of our polarization here that you have the Trump camp, which I assume thinks I used to be making an attempt to save lots of Hillary Clinton. They do not fairly clarify what I used to be doing in October.

And then Clinton camp thinks I was making an attempt to shiv Hillary Clinton. Each cannot be true, however in our polarized world, individuals reside in separate bubbles. I might hope each camps will read this and, I hope, see a deeply flawed human surrounded by different flawed humans making an attempt to make selections with an eye fixed, not on politics, but on those larger values.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:So you wouldn’t change the large selections. What are you sorry about?

JAMES COMEY:Oh, I’m– properly, I am sorry about quite a lot of thing– I’m sorry that Seacrest-ed the announcement. I’m sorry that I– brought on all types of confusion and ache with the best way I described her conduct that led individuals into all types of aspect roads. I’m deeply sorry that I was involved in any respect, but– that’s something I can not keep away from.

And I’m sorry there wasn’t a chance, particularly with the second, to elucidate extra. To say, “Look, here’s what we’re doing.” ‘Trigger I obtained that chance– the one time I’ve truly gotten that probability was in a personal setting with the entire U.S. Senate the place Senator Franken– we have been th– I used to be there to speak about Russia.

But S– then-Senator Franken stuck his hand up and stated, “Can we talk about the elephant in the room? What you did to Hillary Clinton?” And so I turned to Senate Majority Chief McConnell, who was operating the meeting, and stated, “Can I answer that?” And he stated, “Yeah, take all the time you need.”

And so I answered, and I laid out what we have laid out. “Look, here’s where I was on July 5th and why. Here’s October 28th.” And– and Senator Franken truly interrupted and yelled, “However you did not find something.” And I said, “Senator, you will have hindsight bias.

I do know now I did not discover something. However you must come with me to the 28th of October. Sit there with me. What would you do? I see two doors. I can not discover a door that says, “No action.” I see two actions: speak or conceal. Speaking would be terrible. Concealing would be catastrophic.”

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:Not essentially. Robust it out and take your lumps?

JAMES COMEY:Take your lumps. I imply, y– you lead the institutions of justice that may be perhaps eternally, but definitely for a era or more, be unimaginably damaged by conspiring to hide that you simply had lied to the American individuals. And also you had restarted the Hillary Clinton investigation in secret in a approach that you simply thought may change the outcome.

Truthful-minded individuals, and there are a lotta them in America, fair-minded individuals would take a look at that and say, I feel, “How on earth could you do that? You told us we were done. You told us this was finished. And all of a sudden, it’s not finished, and not just in a small way.

You think the result could change. And you didn’t tell us that?” And so, again, individuals can weigh that in a different way, however that’s how I considered it. And so again, in that– in that session with the Senate, I obtained the prospect to lay that out. And I used to be most struck that Senator Chuck Schumer came up to me afterwards, who had been a very, very vocal critic of my selections, and took my hand, and he had tears in his eyes, and he started poking me within the middle of the chest.

He stated, “I know you. I know you. You were in an impossible position.” He wasn’t telling me he agreed with my selections, but I feel as soon as he came with me to October 28th, he understood higher. I feel President Obama understood it.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:You met with President Obama after the election?

JAMES COMEY:Yeah, he held me back after one of many very last conferences I had with him, after the election, and stated he did not need to speak to me about any specific case, ’cause he was very scrupulous about that. And he stated, “But I want to just tell you something generally.

I appointed you to be FBI director because of your integrity and your ability.” After which he appeared me in the eye and he stated, “Nothing has happened, nothing, in the last year that has changed my view of that.” And, look, he wasn’t telling me, “I agree with what you did.”

He wasn’t telling me, “You made the right decision.” He was telling me, “I know where it came from. I know you’re not a partisan hack. I know you’re trying to do the right thing.” And it meant so much to me. I mean, I had not been a political supporter of President Obama’s.

I came to deeply respect him, and his greater loyalty to the values I care lots about. And I g– I virtually received emotional in that second ‘trigger, once more, I might been walking around like Bruce Willis in “The Sixth Sense.” And have the president of the USA say, “I still respect you for the reasons I did originally,” meant rather a lot to me.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:That was a real, in some ways a very raw dialog, in your telling. What else did you tell him?

JAMES COMEY:Yeah, I stated to him– “Mr. President,” to begin with, I stated, “Thank you, Mr. President. It has been a nightmare. I’m just– I’ve just tried to do the right thing.” And he stated, “I know. I know.” After which I stated, “I think my wife would kill me if I didn’t take this chance to thank you, and to tell you how much I’m going to miss you.

And– and also to t–” I advised him that, “I dread the next four years. But in many ways, I feel great pressure to stay to try and protect the institution I lead.”

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:What have been you dreading?

JAMES COMEY:Nicely, I had some sense of the character and character of the brand new president of the USA. And I apprehensive very much that there can be an effort to erode the independence of the FBI. The FBI sits in the government branch, it ought to. The FBI director studies to the lawyer common and the director of Nationwide Intelligence, they usually report back to the president.

They need to. But the FBI all the time needs to be slightly bit alien to the chief department ’cause we’ve got to research the chief department. It is the rationale Congress gave the FBI director a ten-year term, to sign that want for independence. Not– not complete independence, but independence of spirit.

And I frightened, given what I had seen through the campaign, that– that that effort to stay apart– could be challenged in– in a Trump administration. And– and I used to be right, but that is what I frightened about.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:Even your harshest critics will concede what you’re just speaking about proper now– you’ve got lived your life making an attempt to be a person of integrity, making an attempt to reside by honesty, making an attempt to guard the institutions you serve. But within the phrases of Eric Holder, you are a good man; good males make mistakes.

JAMES COMEY:Oh, they positive do. And I– I’ve made one million of them. But again, I feel, even with hindsight, that the process we used to make selections in the e-mail investigation, and the issues we thought-about, and the last word selections, have been the perfect ones. I might be fallacious about that; I haven’t got a monopoly on knowledge.

But– however I’m pleased with the best way we made these selections. And I maintain saying “we.” Once more, they have been my selections; I am accountable for them. However we made them by insuring there was a buncha of individuals banging it around and arguing with one another. And got here to a end result that all of us thought, “Okay, this is the best thing to do in a terrible circumstance.”

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:What did it value you?

JAMES COMEY:What did it value me? Nicely, (SIGH) I’m positive the respect of a lotta individuals that– who could not see what I was seeing, could not understand, couldn’t probably perceive why I was doing what I’ve achieved. It– in a means, I– it didn’t value me a lot beyond that ‘trigger I don’t need to be anything.

I– never going to run for workplace. I needed to be the FBI director for an additional six years. It had no influence on my superior household who still thinks I’m a knucklehead but loves me dearly. And– however I feel that’s what it value me, that it induced a lotta individuals to query whether or not I was a political hack.

Whether or not I used to be in some way– appearing in an unprincipled means. And that’s painful. But on the finish of the day, you need to make a decision and make it in a principled method. You possibly can’t management what individuals take into consideration you. You need individuals to know your reasoning, and I might be mendacity if I stated I don’t hope individuals will come outta this considering, “Oh, okay. I understand better.” But the finish of the day, you gotta take a look at your self in the mirror. And you have to make the decision– the appropriate determination, but most of all for the suitable causes.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:So– so it’s– January 2017. The intelligence group and the F.B.I. have reached their conclusions about what– what Russia did in the course of the election and so you must go tell the president-elect. But first, I assume, the day before–


GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:–you temporary President Obama. Take us inside that room.

JAMES COMEY:Positive. It was right– January 5th within the oval workplace. Director Clapper, the top of the– the director of nationwide intelligence, the top of the C.I.A., the top of the N.S.A., and myself met with President Obama, Vice President Biden, and their senior nationwide safety group within the oval workplace, sitting in the sitting area by the fireside.

The president and the vice chairman in arm chairs with their again to the fireside and I used to be sitting barely off to the fitting so the president would have to look barely left to see me. Director Clapper was sitting in the middle and he briefed them on the findings of the joint intelligence group assessment and the conclusions about what Russia had executed.

And there were quite a lot of questions, particularly targeted on, “So how do we stop it from happening in the future,” questions about sources and whatnot and how sure we have been. And he conveyed that it was a joint high-confidence assessment, which could be very uncommon. From analysts from the– totally different businesses that the Russians had did this, their objectives have been to dirty up the American democracy, to harm Hillary Clinton and to assist elect Donald Trump.

And we have been going to temporary it– he explained that the subsequent morning, to the gang of eight, the leaders of the Home and Senate– intelligence committees and the speaker and majority leader and minority leader on each side. After which we have been going to New York and temporary the president-elect and his workforce.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:You say excessive confidence. Meaning you are positive?

JAMES COMEY:Yeah, that is the closest the intelligence community– you never say you are positive in the intelligence enterprise. The top degree is high confidence. There’s low confidence, medium confidence, excessive. This was the top of the chart. So you by no means say you are positive in the intelligence enterprise because you– you by no means need to be over-confident. But this was– their sense that given the variety of sources and strategies we had, we had this nailed.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:And in that meeting, that’s what Russia did. You additionally mentioned with the president this info you had concerning the president-elect contained within the Steele dossier?

JAMES COMEY:Right. Director Clapper explained to the president and vice chairman that there was further material that had– got here from a dependable source and that we had included as an annex in the report, that it was sufficiently separate, that we didn’t integrate it into the report, nevertheless it was sufficiently reliable that we thought it oughta be part of your complete report.

And there was a portion of it that was notably salacious that associated to allegations around sexual conduct of– before– President Trump was a candidate. And the president asked– President Obama requested, “What’s the plan for briefing that material?”

And he defined that we had determined that Director Comey would meet with the president-elect privately after we briefed the president-elect and his workforce on the overall findings in order that he might evaluate it– in a more personal, more sensitive setting with the president-elect.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:That was James Clapper. How did President Obama reply to that?

JAMES COMEY:He did not say a word. President Obama has an awesome poker face. But he simply turned– so if I’m President Obama, he turned slightly to his left, looked at me, and went like this– and seemed again at Director Clapper. So type of gave me a– Groucho Marx is how I thought of it, double eyebrow increase. Did not say a word, but communicated to me at least– and I might be misreading it, ’cause I do not know President Obama’s eyebrow raises, that kind of– sympathy and concern. Like, “Good luck with that.” And– and that was it.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:Might it have been you again?

JAMES COMEY:It is potential. However– you already know, again, I could possibly be misreading it. But I learn it as, “You poor bastard.” And virtually like, “Whoa,” and– however, you realize, he didn’t explain it and so, like I stated, I– I could be misinterpreting it.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:Was there any selection there? Why– if this was salacious and this specific part of the dossier– unverified– still unverified by the best way?

JAMES COMEY:Sure. Up to now– once I received fired, it was unverified.


JAMES COMEY:As a result of we, the intelligence group, together with the F.B.I., knew this information about allegations round prostitutes in Russia. We had been advised by the press that they have been about to run with it. After which two specific reasons. The– the best way we work in the counterintelligence business is that if a adversary has compromising info on somebody that they could use, one of the methods we defeat the adversary is inform the one that is perhaps blackmailed, “We– the government, we already know about this.

So you’re not going to be able to hide it so they don’t have leverage on you.” After which second, he will be president of america and the top of the complete government department. How might we, the leaders of the intelligence group, know something– whether or not it’s true or not about him personally, that is going to turn out to be public, that the Russians might have and not share it with him. And so the logic of it– was powerful that we should always share it. And the logic, frankly, was highly effective that I ought to do it alone, though I did not love the thought. And so we determined to do it.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:So you all go up to New York the subsequent day, January 6th, for the meeting in Trump Tower. You had– yet one more warning– from the secretary of Homeland Safety.

JAMES COMEY:Proper, as I explained in the e-book, Jeh Johnson, who’s been a good friend of mine since we have been federal prosecutors in Manhattan within the late ’80s, referred to as me after the meeting within the oval workplace with President Obama. Jay had been in the meeting– and just to tell me that he was apprehensive about this plan for me to temporary the president-elect alone about this materials.

And I stated, “Me too.” And he stated, “Have you ever met Donald Trump?” And I said, “No.” And he stated, “Be careful, Jim, be very careful.” And it’s a type of things that you simply respect a pal saying, it is not likely helping me, except to make me feel even more nervous, the lump in my abdomen greater. But, yeah, Jay referred to as me– and I don’t know whether or not he was calling at President Obama’s request, but he appeared to be giving voice to the eyebrow increase.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:So what does “be careful” mean in that context?

JAMES COMEY:Yeah, I do not know. That is why we– thanks, bud. It’s not likely serving to me. I– I took it as, “Just choose your words carefully. Don’t say more than you need to, less than you need to, try to get it just right, accomplish your goal, and then get outta there,” is how I took it.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:So as you headed into Trump Tower that day, have been you nervous?


GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:What have been you afraid of?

JAMES COMEY:Properly, I’m about to satisfy with an individual who does not know me, who’s simply been elected president of the USA. By all accounts, and from my watching him throughout the– the marketing campaign, could possibly be risky. And I am about to speak to him about allegations that he was involved with prostitutes in Moscow and that the Russians taped it and have leverage over him.

And I was fearful that I am about to have a state of affairs emerge the place the president-elect thinks the F.B.I.’s out to get him one way or the other. Individuals, in my experience, are likely to venture onto you their worldview. And regardless that I did not intend to jam Donald Trump with this, my considering was, given his strategy to the world, he might imagine I am pulling a J. Edgar Hoover and assume that I’m making an attempt to dangle this over him to get leverage on him. And so I worried– I’ll not solely destroy any relationship I may need with the president, but more importantly, create a state of affairs where the president and the– and the F.B.I. are at warfare even before he turns into president.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:So you head up to the top of Trump Tower– set the scene.

JAMES COMEY:We went in via the back entrance through– an entrance of– residences. So we snuck around– the press didn’t see us getting into. We went up and met in a convention room somewhere inside the Trump Organization. It was a convention room with a glass wall they usually’d hung an enormous thick curtain to dam the wall from the hallway.

And I walked in with the director of the C.I.A., the director of the N.S.A., and the director of National Intelligence. And we waited for the president-elect to return. A small conference room, seemed kinda atypical to me. And some minutes later he walked in, President-elect Trump, along with the incoming vice chairman and their national security staff.

And a gaggle of them sat at the table with us and a gaggle sat on the wall behind me, towards the curtain. And Director Clapper ran the meeting and did it precisely as he had finished it with the gang of eight earlier that morning on Capitol Hill and with President Obama the day before.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:It was the first time you met Donald Trump. What was your impression?

JAMES COMEY:My impression was he appeared exactly like he did on tv, besides he seemed shorter to me than he did on television, but otherwise exactly the identical. And the rationale I say that is most individuals look slightly totally different in individual. I do not know whether or not that’s dangerous or good, but he appeared the best way I might seen him look on television.


JAMES COMEY:He had– impressively coifed hair, it seems to be to be all his. I confess, I stared at it pretty intently and my reaction was, “It most take a heck of a lot of time in the morning, but it’s impressively coifed.” He looked– his tie was too lengthy, as it all the time is. He seemed slightly orange up shut with small white-half moons underneath his eyes, which I assume are from tanning googles. And otherwise seemed as I had expected him to look from tele– as I assumed he seemed on tv.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:You even clocked the dimensions of his arms?

JAMES COMEY:Yeah. I– I say that in my ebook ‘trigger I am making an attempt to be trustworthy, ’cause that is the truth there had been all this controversy and mocking about hand measurement, I can not keep in mind the small print. But as I shook his hand I made a notice to examine the dimensions and it seemed like he had average-sized palms.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:Then comes the briefing. What did you tell them, what was their reaction?

JAMES COMEY:Director Clapper laid out, as I stated, exactly as he had for President Obama and the gang of eight. “Here’s what the Russians tried to do. They tried to hurt our democracy, they tried to hurt Hillary Clinton, they tried to help elect you. We–” he– was very particular about this, “We did no analysis, because the intelligence community doesn’t, of American politics.

We found no impact on the vote count but we didn’t– we don’t have an opinion to offer on whether the Russian effort had an impact on the election.” And he laid it all out and the– the– President Trump’s first question– President-elect Trump’s first question was to verify that it had no impression on the election.

And– and Director Clapper defined, as I feel he already had, “No, we didn’t do that analysis. We found no Russian manipulation of vote count. We didn’t do an analysis of whether their work was effective in changing votes, changing the– the sentiment of the electorate.”

After which the dialog, to my shock, moved right into a PR dialog about how the Trump workforce would place this and what they might say about this. They actually started talking about drafting a press release with us nonetheless sitting there. And the rationale that was so hanging to me is that– that is simply not achieved.

That the intelligence group does intelligence, the White House does PR and spin, and the searing lesson, as I defined in the guide, of the Iraq struggle is you do not mix the two. That we offer you information after which we depart and then you figure out what you are going to tell individuals about them, if something. However it moved right into this, “Let’s figure out what to say about it,” kinda deal.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:You additionally stated you have been struck by what they didn’t ask?

JAMES COMEY:Very much. Nobody, to my recollection, requested, “So what– what’s coming next from the Russians?” You are about to steer a rustic that has an adversary attacking it and I don’t keep in mind any questions on, “So what are they going to do next, how might we stop it? What’s the future look like? Because we’ll be custodians of the security of this country.” There was none of that. It was all, “What can we say about what they did and how it affects the election that we just had.”

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:You– you stated as this was occurring, you had a flashback to your early days as a prosecutor?

JAMES COMEY:Yeah. Again, I– put this in the guide ’cause it is the truth. I had a flashback to my days investigating the Mafia, La Cosa Nostra. And– and I couldn’t work out why when it first pushed into my head, so I pushed it away, saying, “That’s crazy.” And then it got here back again.

And I pushed it back and it came again again. And I feel what it was was the character of La Cosa Nostra is an effort to make everybody a part of the family. There’s an expression within the Mafia– there is a distinction between a good friend of yours and a good friend of ours. A pal of yours is somebody on the surface of the household, a good friend of ours, a “amica nostra” is the best way they talked about it in Sicilian, is a part of the Household, capital F.

And I feel the rationale it was coming into my head was I felt this effort to make us all– and perhaps this wasn’t their intention, nevertheless it’s the best way it felt to me, to make us all “amica nostra.” We’re all part of the messaging, we’re all part of the trouble. The boss is at the head of the desk and we will work out together how to do this. And I feel that’s why it brought that strange reminiscence again into my head.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:Do you assume you shoulda stated one thing then?

JAMES COMEY:Perhaps. I imply, I– I– I feel that is an inexpensive question. I ought to’ve stated, “Hey– Mr. President-elect, the way it works is we in the intelligence community shouldn’t be here for this.” I– I assume that is an inexpensive query. I feel the rationale I didn’t, I hope is clear to people, is that I used to be about to– we had simply delivered, “The Russians tried to help get you elected.”

And I used to be about to remain behind to talk about allegations of the president being concerned with prostitutes in Moscow. And I assumed, “That’s gotta be my focus.” And so I didn’t– I didn’t know where it entered my mind consciously. I did not spend lots of time considering, “Should I be giving them a lesson about how to interact with the intelligence community.”

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:Do you assume that briefing satisfied the president that the Russians did intrude in the election?

JAMES COMEY:I don’t– I don’t know. I don’t assume so, given things he’s stated thereafter and a number of the issues he’s stated concerning the intelligence group after that. I feel it satisfied members of his employees, but as to him, I– given what he stated afterwards, I do not assume so.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:Did he say anything concerning the broader briefing?

JAMES COMEY:In that session? No. Not that I keep in mind.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:And then you definitely went– everyone else left the room–

JAMES COMEY:Yeah– Director Clapper– I name him Basic Clapper, ‘trigger he was a retired common. Common Clapper said– and– “Mr. President-elect, there’s some additional material that we think it makes sense of Director Comey to brief you on– privately. And– and we’ll all excuse ourselves in a small group.”

And the president-elect then stated to me, “Okay, how small.” And I said, “Properly, I was considering simply the 2 of us, sir.” After which his incoming chief of employees, Reince Priebus, stated, “How about me, Reince Priebus, and the vice president?” And I stated, turning to President-elect Trump, “It’s up to you, sir. I wanted it to be a small group, but it’s entirely up to you.” And then he said– I do not know whether or not he knew what I was going to talk about it, however he said– “No, no, just the two of us, just the two of us, thanks everybody.” And then the group filed out.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:Simply the two of you. What do you tell him?

JAMES COMEY:I did not inform him anything. First he started by telling me– saying good issues to me about how he thought I might carried out myself honorably through the Clinton e-mail investigation and that he knew that folks on the F.B.I. thought very extremely of me and he hoped very much that I was going to stay as F.B.I. director.


JAMES COMEY:Un– oh, unprompted. And I didn’t say, “Thank you,” because my view was I already have the job. Congress states a ten yr term with a purpose to guarantee continuity. And so I respect the great phrases, however I did not need to make it look like I used to be making use of for a job that I already had and meant to have for an additional six years.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:So to be clear, at that time, he was glad with how you had handled the Clinton e-mail investigation?

JAMES COMEY:Properly, at that point, he stated that. Now, whether– whether or not that– I came to conclude that plenty of occasions what he stated was simply sort of pleasantries to begin a conversation, so I don’t know whether or not he actually thought I had handled it nicely. However he stated, in substance, “You handled it well, you conducted yourself honorably.

And I know the people at the F.B.I. really like you. And I really hope you’re going to stay as director.” And that– when that was completed, I then turned to the subject and stated, “Sir, there’s a portion of the material that we wanted to brief you privately to make sure you’re aware of it because– the– we understand the media may be– gonna publish it very soon.”

After which I started to inform him concerning the allegation was that he had been involved with prostitutes in a lodge in Moscow in 2013 through the go to for the Miss Universe pageant and that the Russians had– filmed the episode. And he interrupted very defensively and started talking about it, you already know, “Do I look like a guy who needs hookers?”

And I assumed he was asking that rhetorically, I did not answer that, and I simply moved on and– and defined, “Sir, I’m not saying that we credit this, I’m not saying we believe it. We just thought it very important that you know.” And I defined, “One of the F.B.I.’s jobs is to protect presidency from coercion. And if there is any effort, one of the things we do is a defensive briefing to let the person who might be the target of that coercion know that this is out there, better equip us to defend ourselves against the adversary.”

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:Did you tell him you thought it wasn’t true otherwise you didn’t know if it was true or not?

JAMES COMEY:I stated, “We’re not saying that– I’m not saying that I believe the allegations, I’m not saying that I credit it.” I never stated, “I don’t believe it,” because I– I could not say a method or another. However I stated, “We are not– I’m not saying we believe the allegations,” or I’d’ve used the phrase “credit the allegations.”

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:How graphic did you get?

JAMES COMEY:I feel as graphic as I needed to be. I didn’t go into the enterprise about– individuals peeing on one another, I just thought it was a bizarre enough expertise for me to be talking to the incoming president of the USA about prostitutes in a lodge in Moscow. And so I left that part out. I assumed I might given sufficient to put him on discover as to what the essence of the material was.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:What was the look on his face?

JAMES COMEY:He was very defensive and began to launch into– for reasons that I do not understand, began going into the listing of people who had accused him of touching them improperly, sexual assault and the way he hadn’t executed this, he hadn’t achieved that, he hadn’t achieved that.

And I frightened the conversation was about to crash, because I was reading that he was reacting like, “We’re investigating you and we’re going to go figure out whether you were with prostitutes in Moscow.” And– and so I stated one thing in substance about how we don’t– it– “We’re not investigating you, sir. This is not something that we’re– we care about, except that you know that this is out there.”

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:Did you consider his denial?

JAMES COMEY:I do not– I do not know. I don’t– the character of an investigator is you don’t consider or disbelieve. You ask, “What’s my evidence? What is the evidence that establishes me whether someone’s telling me the truth or not. And ask this allegation–” I truthfully never thought this phrases would come out of my mouth, however I do not know whether or not the– the– current president of the USA was with prostitutes peeing on one another in Moscow in 2013. It is attainable, but I do not know.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:How bizarre was that briefing?

JAMES COMEY:Really bizarre. I mean, I don’t know whether it was weird for President-elect Trump, but I– it was virtually an out-of-body expertise for me. I used to be floating above myself, wanting down, saying, “You’re sitting here, briefing the incoming president of the United States about prostitutes in Moscow.” And naturally, Jeh Johnson’s voice is banging around in my head. President Obama’s eyebrow increase is banging around in my head. I just needed to get it accomplished and get out of there.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:Did you tell him that the Steele File had been financed by his political opponents?

JAMES COMEY:No. I didn’t– I didn’t assume I used the time period “Steele Dossier,” I simply talked about further materials.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:Did he– however did he have a proper to know that?

JAMES COMEY:That it’d been financed by his political opponents? I do not know the reply to that. I– it wasn’t crucial for my objective, which was to alert him that we had this info. Once more, I was clear on whether it’s true or not, it is essential that you understand, each because of the counterintelligence purpose and so you realize that this perhaps going to hit the media.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:So how did it finish?

JAMES COMEY:It ended not lengthy after I said– it only took a few minutes after I made clear to him, “We’re not investigating you.” And– I feel he asked one thing like, “Is there anything?” And I said, “No, sir.” And then we shook palms and I walked out.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:You had been warned, at the least by some individuals in your employees, not to inform him, “We’re not investigating you.” Was that a mistake?

JAMES COMEY:It may need been– a mistake. The overall counsel of the F.B.I. had argued, “Look, it’s literally true that we don’t have a case open on President-elect Trump. We’re looking at other people.” And– and– however his argument was, “There’s a problem with you saying that for two reasons. First, inevitably as we move along in the investigation as– as to whether anyone was working with the Russians, the campaign’s going to have to be a focus and the candidate’s always the head of the campaign, so inevitably we’re going to have to look at him. And second, you’re going to create a duty to correct. But if you tell him he’s under investigation and that changes, don’t you have to go back and tell him-”

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:And you thought that was an inexpensive prospect?

JAMES COMEY:I did not know at that time limit whether that might change or not. But– and I stated to the overall counsel, look, I get that, that is sensible to me. However I am very frightened about starting a brand new administration with the president considering the F.B.I. is out to get him.

Now in hindsight, given the challenges I had with President Trump and his frustrations that I wouldn’t publicly say he is not beneath investigation, I feel the better argument is it was a mistake, I ought to’ve listened to the overall counsel. But anyhow, that is how I think about it.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:President Trump thought you have been shaking him down?

JAMES COMEY:I do not know that. But I– it appears affordable, given his view of the world. Keep in mind, that was what I apprehensive about is that he would assume I was pulling a J. Edgar Hoover, to return in there and jam him by elevating the prospect of salacious, compromising materials.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:But you felt you had no selection?

JAMES COMEY:Yeah, I assumed the logic was too robust that– how might we’ve this info and conceal it from the incoming president of the USA? And look, if it’s true– once more, we do not know whether it is true or not. But if it is true, and as odd as it sounds, it might probably be true, we’ve to guard him. We now have to guard the presidency. And so part of our– our position because the F.B.I. is let him know that they could come at you with this.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:If it is true, how are you going to shield him?

JAMES COMEY:Properly, if it’s true– if someone is aware of something dangerous about you that they are going to perhaps use towards you and also you’re in the government and– and I’m the F.B.I., if I come to you and inform you, “We know all about this,” it’ll make it more durable for them to get you to do stuff based mostly on this secret. As a result of you realize that we know. And so it makes– it reduces the leverage of the adversary.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:Positive enough, a number of days later, it does turn into public.


GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:Buzzfeed– publishes the entire– Steele “dossier”– as you all had feared it might happen. And that is whenever you get your first telephone call from President Trump.

JAMES COMEY:Sure, that’s right. So the next week, the– as you stated, the– the media revealed the entire– factor and President Trump referred to as me at my office on the F.B.I. and he was very upset concerning the leak of this material and needed to precise his concern about it.

And I defined to him that it wasn’t– that it wasn’t authorities materials. That it had been ready by personal events, the F.B.I. hadn’t paid for it, the F.B.I. hadn’t commissioned it, and it was throughout Washington. “And as you’ll remember, sir, as we told we, the media has this and is close to reporting it. So we shouldn’t think of it as a leak of– of classified information. It wasn’t classified and it– that it wasn’t government information.”

After which he launched into– I didn’t ask concerning the business with the prostitutes, however he launched into an evidence as to how I should know that wasn’t true and that he remembered now, from talking to pals who had been with him, that he’d never stayed in a single day on the lodge, he’d just changed garments there and went to the Miss Universe pageant.

I don’t know whether any of this true, but that is what he stated. And then went right back without staying in a single day. And then he stated, “Another reason you know it’s not true is I’m a germaphobe. There’s no way I’d let people pee on each other around me.” And that me caught me a lot abruptly I truly let loose an audible giggle and– ’cause it was just certainly one of those– I was startled by it.

And– and I keep in mind considering, “Well, should I say that, ‘As I understand the activity sir, it doesn’t require an overnight stay. And given that it was allegedly the presidential suite at the Ritz Carlton, I would imagine you could be at a safe distance from the activity–‘” all this stuff are bouncing round my head. But as an alternative of saying it, it just led me to assume, “The world’s gone crazy.

I’m the director of the F.B.I. and I’m standing at my window, looking out on the darkened Pennsylvania Avenue.” And I keep in mind this second prefer it was yesterday. And I can see the lit– Washington Monument that is rising from my vantage level of the F.B.I. simply over the Trump– new Trump lodge. And I just keep in mind considering, “Everything’s gone mad.” And then, having completed his rationalization, which I hadn’t requested for, he hung up. And I went to seek out my chief of employees to tell him that the world’s gone loopy.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:And actually, he did stay in a single day in Moscow.

JAMES COMEY:I do not know. However– however once more, I– I– I do not know those information. However he informed me he didn’t.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:So– so– at– at– at this point, you’ve got had– two substantive conversations with the president. The bulk of it’s about his alleged activities with prostitutes in Moscow.


GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:And as you say, that seems slightly crazy.

JAMES COMEY:It did to me. You might’ve requested me, once I turned F.B.I. director, if I might imagine these conversations. Like, it’s exhausting to think about them even sitting here. But– it is– it’s reality as we speak.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:The president is inaugurated every week later. I need to attempt to get inside your head again at that second, because now you’ve got had these encounters with the president. He’s taken the oath of office, you are thinking–

JAMES COMEY:I am considering I must be very cautious to guard the independence of the F.B.I. As a result of I now know– I’ve had two one on one conversations with the president of america, which is a really unusual thing. Both of them touched on his conduct personally and implicated the F.B.I.

I want to ensure to maintain that distance to protect the F.B.I.’s independence, which had been constructed since Hoover. I imply, Hoover was all the time over having drinks with presidents and doing all types of stuff– that was– not applicable. Gathering info, all that kind of factor on political figures. And the F.B.I., since Watergate, had created itself as an unbiased pressure in American life, so I must be a guardian of that.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:And that affected you– a few days later if you acquired invited to the White Home. You’d been invited for a reception?

JAMES COMEY:Yeah, the– the– the weekend of the inauguration, on Sunday, which was also the day of the National Football League Conference Championships. I keep in mind that due to the time of the occasion. At 5:00, the president posted the regulation enforcement leaders of the businesses that had helped shield the inauguration, which is a really nice factor to do. And it was at 5:00 within the blue room at the White Home.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:You didn’t need to go?

JAMES COMEY:Yeah, I didn’t need to go for two reasons. First, I nervous very much about that independence of the F.B.I. And, remember– and I am positive everyone listening remembers, there have been an entire lot of people who thought that I had helped elect Donald Trump by what I had finished on the finish of October.

And so why would I need to go to a public reception– a probably public reception with the president two days after he takes office? And then second, I needed to observe soccer and the championship games have been on and 5:00 was proper in the middle– I might miss the top of 1 recreation and the start of another.

My employees stated, “No, you have to go. You’re the director of the F.B.I. It would be an insult to the other agencies– secret service, park police, if you don’t go. And you can tape the football games and just don’t talk to people about them.”


JAMES COMEY:And so I went.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:–you do go and also you walk in. You are there because the president walks in. What happens next?

JAMES COMEY:I walked into the blue room, which is an enormous blue oval room. And I shortly appeared round, making an attempt to figure out where– which means the president would enter and I figured where the doors have been. And so I went to the far opposite end, right on the window, where you’ll be able to look out and see the Washington monument. And I– so I used to be now as distant as bodily potential with out going out the window from the president. And I resolved to stay there and–

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:Arduous for you to cover?

JAMES COMEY:Yeah, and I virtually obtained away it here though. And– the– you’d assume that you’d discover me, this giraffe standing on the finish of the room. But I used to be standing subsequent to the top of the secret service, who’s a traditional sized individual, and the president and vice chairman are available and the– the employees has arrange these klieg lights, so I know the media is coming.

After which the media group comes in and the president begins speaking on digital camera and his eyes start sweeping the room. And I keep in mind the movement of his eyes ’cause I used to be– obviously, thought I used to be going to be noticed. And he went previous me with his eyes and settled on the man proper subsequent to me, the top of the secret service.

And I was relieved and stunned. And he referred to as the director of the key service forward, made a big– show, hugged him, and then had him stand with him in entrance of the cameras. And then he started speaking. And, I know this seems loopy to individuals, however I used to be sitting there considering, “So how did he miss me?”

I am 6’eight”. And then I– I look and right next to me is this blue curtain. And I’m wearing a blue suit the doesn’t match perfectly, but close enough. So I’m thinking, “How great is that? I obtained a bit of camouflage.” And so I start moving over and I pressed myself against the blue curtain, true story.

Thinking — this is my save. This will save me from having this public embrace with the president. And so then he starts speaking again and his eyes start going again. And my camouflage worked until the very moment it didn’t and he sees me and says, “Jim, he is more famous than me,” and then calls me forward. And I remember the walk, it seems like a thousand yards across the– the– the– blue room– the oval blue room. And my family’s had a lot of fun watching my face as I walk across, ’cause they know that’s my “oh no” face.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:Well, that’s not exactly what Patrice said, is it?

JAMES COMEY:Well, I didn’t want to say it on television. She said, “That is Jim’s ‘oh shit’ face.” And so I’m walking forward thinking that, thinking, “How might he assume this can be a good concept? That he will try to hug me, the man that an entire lot of people assume, although that is not true, however assume I attempted to get him elected president and did. Isn’t he grasp of television, that is disastrous.”

And I’m thinking all this as I’m walking and I have this awkward look on my face. But I was determined there’s not going to be a hug, ’cause I’m not a master of television but I knew that would be a real problem. And so I extend my hand and he grabs my hand and he pulls in and back. So he–

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:So he was going to hug you?

JAMES COMEY:He was going for the hug, going for the hug. And so I’m not an unusually strong person but I work out and so I tighten my abs and my core and I’m thinking, this– “Until he’s quite a bit robust than he seems, he is not getting a hug.” And so he pulls and he doesn’t get the hug.

Our arms are tense and he gets just far enough that I get something worse than a hug. Because he’s just able to lean up to put his face by my right ear– unfortunately, the cameras were on the left side of my face. And so the whole world saw him kiss me. And he didn’t kiss me, he said, “I really look ahead to working with you. But the entire world, including my beloved household, saw the president of america kiss the man who helped get him elected.”

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:So– and I know this is speculative, but what do you think is going through his mind? You’ve briefed him twice, you’ve spoken with him twice. We know what the subject has been. You’ve been talking to him about Moscow. Has he forgotten that?

JAMES COMEY:I don’t know. ‘Cause I don’t– I worked with him for five months, I have some insight into the mind of Donald Trump. And so I’ll give you my best guess as to it– what I think it is. I think it’s about establishing dominance and making everyone part of the family.

And so, although there would be hits from embracing him, he would embrace me– he’s embracing me, making me his F.B.I. director. He had made the secret service director stay with him up there, almost on display. And after the alleged kiss, which wasn’t a kiss, he tried to get me to stay as well, almost to show, “These are my individuals.”

And I backed off, like, “I’m undeserving, I am undeserving,” which inside my head, I was thinking, “I’m not suicidal.” And so then I backed, backed, backed up to the end. But if I had to guess– and I could be wrong. But– my guess is it’s about establishing, “These are my individuals.”

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:He follows up with an invitation on January 27th?

JAMES COMEY:Yup. I’m at lunch. I almost never went to lunch as F.B.I. director. I would walk up to the cafeteria and get a sandwich and eat it at my desk. So I’m at my desk, eating my lunch and working. And my assistant, Althea James, says, “There’s a call– coming from the White Home.” And they put it through and it’s the president asking me if I want to come over for dinner that night. And I said– I had a date with Patrice to get Thai food that night, but I didn’t tell him that. I said, “Positive, sir.” And he said–


JAMES COMEY:Well, it’s the president of the United States calling to ask me to a dinner. And I was assuming it was a group dinner that– ’cause it– it actually didn’t enter my mind that the president would meet alone, again, with the F.B.I. director.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:Yeah, but you had been pretty scrupulous. You wouldn’t play basketball with President Obama, you only met with him on a non-policy issue once and that was before you were F.B.I. director. You really wanted to keep a wall–


GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:–between the F.B.I. and the White House. Can’t you just say no?

JAMES COMEY:Maybe? Although, part of the environment was I had– I remember, I had this concern about having a war with the president and I’d done the brief on hookers thing privately. And so I knew that there would be a worry about, “The place is the F.B.I.?”

Plus, I assumed it would be a group event. And I had been to group events with President Obama. He would have a annual dinner for the senior appointees in the administration. I was one, the director of National Intelligent is another. So I had gone to those.

And so it actually didn’t occur to me to say no. I was uncomfortable, but it didn’t occur to me. And so I just said to him, “Sir– definitely, sir.” And he said– “6:00 or 6:30?” And I said, “It’s as much as you, sir.” And he actually say, “And in case you’re– in the event you’re busy tonight, I can do it tomorrow. I am here all weekend.”

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:So you knew then it wasn’t a group dinner?

JAMES COMEY:Well no, ’cause I assumed he must be having leaders over to get to know them in groups. And the– and so I said, “Sir, no matter you– whatever you want.” And he said, “Nicely, why don’t we make it 6:30?” And I said, “Positive.” And then I called Patrice, broke our date, and– as luck had it, I had– an encounter with Clapper, who had left the government but we were giving him a recognition as honorary F.B.I. agent.

And I told him about this invitation and he told– comforted me by saying, “Yeah, I’ve heard a lot of other individuals are getting calls to return for dinner.” And so then in my head I was– “Okay, so it is a group thing. He have to be having a gaggle thing tonight, a gaggle factor tomorrow night time. That is fantastic.” And so I went over there expecting– a crowd of people.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:And what did you find?

JAMES COMEY:I stood in the entrance to the green room, which is next to the blue room, and chatted with two Navy stewards who were there.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:This is the residence?

JAMES COMEY:Yeah, in the residence. And looked around the room and quickly saw that all the furniture had been moved in the– in the center of the room. There was a small oval table and there were only two chairs and I could see two place cards. And I could see from where I was standing, one said, “Director Comey.” I assume the opposite was the president. And so that’s once I knew that it wasn’t a gaggle dinner to get to know the leaders of our totally different businesses, that it was simply the 2 of us.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:What did you assume was happening?

JAMES COMEY:Something that made me uncomfortable and my greatest intuition at that time was it’s a part of an effort to make me part of the workforce, to make me “amica nostra.” And that it made me deeply uncomfortable. And so I just waited. There was no– there was no saying no at this point.

And the president showed up and had me sit down and it turned out simply to be the two of us and that the aim of the assembly, the dinner was for him to extract from him a promise of loyalty. That intuition was proper, it was to make me a pal of ours.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:As you have been witting with him, he– he was simply getting used to the trimmings of–



JAMES COMEY:I feel he was. I feel he was. He– he was– he took on– on the plates was a card– a calligraphy card, so– very good script. You all the time see these at the White House. And it listed the menu for the dinner we have been about to have.

And so he– I keep in mind, he held his up and stated, “They write these by hand.” And I said, “A calligrapher?” And he kind of gave me this look and he said, “They write them by hand.” And so I– I kinda let it go. And– and then he talked about– one of the things he said was how luxurious the White House was, the residence. And he said, “I– and I know luxurious.” And– which I credit. And– he said, “It’s– it’s actually lovely.”

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:How long did it take to get down to business?

JAMES COMEY:Not long. I think it was probably during the salad, before the shrimp scampi. He redirected the conversation– I think we started talking about how the beautiful the White House was. He redirected the conversation by saying, “So what do you need to do?”

And I kinda gave him this look and then he explained what he meant. And he said, “You already know, lots of people would need to be F.B.I. director and given all you’ve got gone by way of, I might perceive if you wish to stroll away however it will appear to be you’d executed something fallacious for those who did that. However I figured I should meet with you and– and see what you need to do,” which was really odd because I think, by that point, at least three times, he had said he hoped I was staying and looked forward to working with me. But there was no acknowledgment of that.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:Do you think he wanted you to walking away?

JAMES COMEY:No. No, I think he wanted me to say, “Sir, I might very very similar to to continue to serve and be your F.B.I. director.” And then he would say, “Okay, however I want loyalty, I anticipate loyalty,” which is exactly what he did say, the– the second part. So I think it was about– again, this is just a guess but it’s an educated guess, that someone had told him or he had concluded that he gave the F.B.I. director job away for free by telling this guy you hope he’s going to stay. You oughta get him in front of you and make sure he’s a friend of ours. And– and have him promise he’s going to be loyal, ’cause the F.B.I. is a dangerous organization.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:So he asks you what you want and says what he wants?



JAMES COMEY:He said, “I anticipate loyalty, I want loyalty.” And I did not reply. I just– we’re– actually, the– we were probably just about as close as you and I are now, probably exactly the same at this small table. And I just stared at him and had this little narrative with myself inside, saying, “Do not you move, don’t you dare transfer. Don’t even blink.” Because I was so struck by– caught by it, but I knew I couldn’t say yes, I couldn’t nod, and so I just froze and stared at him.


JAMES COMEY:That’s a fair question. I think because I was caught totally by surprise. And again, I’m operating in an environment where I don’t want– I’m going to be director for another six years. This man’s the new president of the United States, I do not need a war with him.

I have to find a way to work with this administration and protect the values of the F.B.I. And so– and part of it was just sheer surprise. I couldn’t think of a clever response. And by the second time he came back to it, he didn’t respond at all. We just stared at each other and then he went on eating. And then he came back to– he didn’t– he noticed that I didn’t answer. He came back to it later in the dinner. And by then, I had my wits about me and had a better answer.GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:What was the second time?

JAMES COMEY:The second time was later in the conversation. He said, again, “I want loyalty.” And I said, “You’ll all the time get honesty from me.” And he paused and then he said, “Trustworthy loyalty,” as if he was proposing some compromise or a deal. And I paused and said, “You will get that from me.” And, of course, in between those two– the loyalty sandwich, in between those two, I had– I had an opportunity to explain to him the F.B.I.’s role and how important it was for the F.B.I. to be independent and how I thought about it.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:But did you cross a line there– did you cross a line when you promised him honest loyalty? Did– would it be fair for him to think, “Wait, I’ve a deal right here.”

JAMES COMEY:Yeah, I– I don’t think so. Given the context and the other things I’d said, I thought– and look, it was a compromise on my part to try and avoid a really awkward conversation, get out of an awkward conversation.


JAMES COMEY:Yeah, I don’t know. But– maybe, maybe. And maybe I should’ve said in the moment, “Sir, as I informed you, the F.B.I. has to be–” and then give him the speech again, maybe. But– and so maybe I should’ve been– yeah, that’s fair feedback. Maybe I should’ve been tougher or more direct, especially given what I know now.

At the time, I obviously couldn’t see the future. But given what I know now, maybe it would’ve been better to give a more explicit– say, “Sir, I can not promise you loyalty. Given the nature of my position, I can promise you I all the time inform you the reality,” which I had already told him. “That is my position. And that I am not part of it.”

I ought to’ve provided that entire speech then. However within the moment, frankly, it didn’t happen to me. And I– perhaps I did not have the center to do it. I needed to get out of this conversation with out compromising myself. And I felt like, given all I’ve informed him already, he has to know what I mean by trustworthy loyalty and he is kidding himself if he thinks I simply promised that I am– I am “amica nostra.” But– in hindsight, you are in all probability right. I in all probability should have executed it in another way.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:How unusual is it for you to sit here and examine the president to a mob boss?

JAMES COMEY:Very unusual. And I don’t do it frivolously. I– and I am not making an attempt to that, by the best way, recommend that President Trump is out breaking legs and– you recognize, shaking down shopkeepers. However as an alternative, what I am speaking about is that leadership tradition always comes back to me once I take into consideration my expertise with the Trump administration.

The– the loyalty oaths, the boss because the dominant middle of every thing, it is all about how do you serve the boss, what’s in the boss’ pursuits. It is the household, the family, the family, the household. That’s why it reminds me a lot and never, “So what’s the fitting thing for the nation and what are the values of the establishments that we’re dealing with?” It’s all about here.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:What was the rest of the able talk like?

JAMES COMEY:I think I described it in the book as, like– watching a jigsaw puzzle contest with a shot clock, that the president would– it wasn’t a conversation in any meaningful sense, ’cause a conversation’s what we’re having where you do some talking, I do some talking.

It was him talking almost the entire time, which I’ve discovered is something he frequently does. And so it would be monologue in this direction, monologue in that direction, monologue in a different direction. And a constant series of assertions that– about the inauguration crowd, about how great my inauguration speech was, about all the free media– earned media, I think was his term, that I got during the campaign.

On and on and on and on. Everyone agrees, everyone agrees, I did this, the– I never assaulted these women, I never made fun of a reporter. And– I’m sure you’re wondering what question did I ask that would prompt those? None, zero. I didn’t ask any questions that I recall.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:You call them baffling, unnecessary lies.

JAMES COMEY:Yeah, that’s the things that’s– especially to someone who’s– who’s been involved in investigation in the justice system my whole life, is– to give you an example, he– at the beginning of the meeting, he tells us– tells me Reince Priebus, his chief of staff, does not know we’re meeting, which I thought was st– I remember it because I thought, “How might the chief of employees not know the president’s assembly with the F.B.I. director?”

And then later in the same meal, near the end, he says, “Reince knows we’re having dinner, so follow-up with Reince.” Just– so one of those things is not true. One of those things is a lie, but it reminded me of the inauguration crowd thing. Right, that it’s– his inauguration crowd was bigger than that Barack Obama’s first inauguration.

That’s just not true. That’s not a perspective, that’s not a view, that’s just a lie. And– and yet he would say it and, “Everyone agrees, everybody says, everybody believes,” and the– the danger sort of occurred to me is– ’cause you don’t have a chance to speak. That’s washing over you, washing over you, washing over you.

Did you just agree to that? Did you just agree that he didn’t make fun of a disabled reporter because you– because you didn’t speak? Well, you did have a chance to speak because there was no gap at all in the words. But I– I have an encounter with him two weeks later where I learn from that and try to interrupt him to tell him I don’t agree with him. But in this conversation, my first detail conversation, he’s just rolling on, talking about all kinds of things.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:So you’re listening. Are you thinking, “President Trump’s a liar?”

JAMES COMEY:Yes, yeah. I– and I– and I had, obviously, concerns about that earlier, having watched him on the campaign that he is someone who is– for whom the truth is not a high value. And– and obviously, there were examples of that in the dinner.

The Priebus thing is– is an example of it. The– the inauguration thing is an example of it. I’m sure there are others in the conversation. But yes, that he is– that sometimes he’s lying in ways that are obvious, sometimes he’s saying things that we may not know are true or false and then there’s a spectrum in between.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:And then unprompted, he brings up the golden shower again.

JAMES COMEY:Correct, yeah. He brings it up and says he may want me to investigate it to prove that it didn’t happen. And then he says– something that distracted me. ‘Cause he said, you know, “If there’s even a 1 % probability my wife thinks that is true, that is terrible.”

And I– and I remember thinking, “How might your wife assume there is a 1 % probability you have been with prostitutes peeing on each other in Moscow?” I’m a flawed human being, but there is literally zero chance that my wife would think that was true. So what kind of marriage to what kind of man does your wife think there’s only a 99 percent chance you didn’t do that?

And the reason I’m recounting this is I remember– I wasn’t listening to him, ’cause I’m running this through my head, like, how could that possibly be true? And I said to him, “Sir–” when he started talking about it, “I’ll order you to research that,” I said, “Sir, that is as much as you. But you’d need to watch out about that, because it’d create a story that we’re investigating you personally. And second, it is very troublesome to show one thing did not occur.”

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:And did he accept that?

JAMES COMEY:He said he would think about it. And he said, “I hope you will think about it too.”

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:You notice something else– during that dinner. You say the president didn’t laugh.

JAMES COMEY:Yeah, not at all. And I was struck by it. So struck by it, it stayed with me, that I’ve never seen him laugh. Not in public, not in private. And at a dinner with someone– I mean, I’m not a comedian but I occasionally say something that’s funny that people chuckle with each other.

But I never saw anything that resembled a laugh. And I could over interpret that, I could be– also we’re missing something that– that maybe he’s– he’s breaking up in stitches with other people other than the F.B.I. director, but I also tried– after I got fired, I thought– that stayed with me. And so I went and tried to find examples of videos where he’s laughing and I could only find that really wasn’t a genuine laugh.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:The dinner ends, you immediately write it up. Why?

JAMES COMEY:Because I knew, given the nature of the conversation and the nature of the person I was talking to, that to protect the F.B.I. and to protect myself, I would need to remember very accurately what we talked about it. And as the F.B.I. director, you have thousands of conversations.

And– and so the detail can get lost over time. I knew that, given that I worried he might not tell the truth about our encounter and given that it touched on him personally, that I thought, “You already know, I have to have a written document of this.” And so I went home, on my personal computer, and created a memo and kept a copy of it in my personal safe at home and left another copy of it at the F.B.I. Because it was about both protecting the F.B.I. and protecting me.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:Do you think President Trump got what we wanted out of that dinner?

JAMES COMEY:No. And I think he knew that because it was a later point when he was frustrated with me that I wouldn’t get out– as he said, get out that I’m not under investigation, where he tried to recall the loyalty pledge, I think, from the context. Where he said, “You already know, I’ve been very loyal to you, ‘trigger we had that thing.”

And I– I think what he was doing was trying to recall our encounter at that dinner and it coming up in his memory as, “Truly, the man did not promise to be loyal to me. He promised me trustworthy loyalty and– and that’s truly what he’s giving me now by telling me, ‘You oughta have your lawyer name the Department of Justice.'”

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:About 10 days later you’re back in the White House. You’re– meeting with Reince– previously the chief of staff– when he suggested you go meet with the president again.

JAMES COMEY:Yeah. This was a follow-up meeting to the dinner from the 27th. And it’s us talking about a variety of topics, some of which were classified, but one of which was, so how should it work? How does the F.B.I. appropriately interact with the White House. And I was explaining it has to be through the Justice Department, it’s important that there be a regular channel, except for national security emergencies or national security policy issues.

And at the end of that conversation, which was designed to explain– and Priebus, to his credit, seemed to want to get it right. But at the end, he asked me whether I wanted to see the president. And I said, “No, that’s okay. I’m positive he is obtained lots to do.” And he said, “I am positive he’d love to see you.” And I said, “No, n– that is positive.”

He said, “Sit. Sit.” And then he left and– went down the hall, apparently to the Oval Office, and came back and said, “He’s within the Oval. He’d like to see you.” And I said, without expression, “Nice.” And then he takes me down to the Oval Office and the president was just finishing a conversation with the then-s– Press Secretary Sean Spicer. And I came in and sat down.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:Let me stop you there. You’ve been in the Oval Office several times in your career. You served several presidents. How is it different?

JAMES COMEY:It was different– well I noticed right away the curtains were different. He had hung bright, gold curtains, which I found out later were actually Bill Clinton’s Oval Office curtains, excuse me, since changed. And– but most striking was that he was sitting behind the resolute desk, the big– the president’s desk, which I had actually never seen Presidents Bush or Obama do during a meeting.

They would be there sometimes for phone calls, I gather, but when I was there they always sat in the open sitting area, which made sense to me as someone who tries to get people as a leader to tell you the truth. It’s much easier in an informal setting. But I noticed he was behind the desk with– both arms on the table top, on the desktop. And so I sat– so there’s a gigantic block of wood between us, I sat in a little wooden chair right up against the desk. And the conversation started and– and Reince was trying to steer it, in part, towards the Steele dossier, and the president wasn’t interested in that.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:Why did Reince want to talk about that?

JAMES COMEY:I don’t know for sure. I don’t– I don’t know. He seemed to want to bring the topic up. I– I don’t– I don’t know exactly. I–

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:You know, you mentioned something about– since you brought up the Steele dossier again, you mentioned that the parts about– the prostitutes was– unverified. You don’t know whether they’re true or not. What about the rest of the Steele dossier? Has it checked out? Is it a credible document?

JAMES COMEY:The answer is, I don’t know. When I left the F.B.I when I was fired in early May of last year, an effort was underway by the F.B.I. to try to verify as much as pos– rule in or rule out what– and that work was still ongoing. So I don’t know what the answer is. It came from a credible source.

And as I said, its central premise was corroborated, that there was an effort by the Russians to influence the election and that there had been some connections between people associated with the Trump campaign and the Russian effort, in particular the Papadopoulos information that started the F.B.I.’s investigation.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:So connections between the Trump campaign and Russia had been corroborated by the time you left the F.B.I.?

JAMES COMEY:I think all I can say is that– the– the work was still underway, the investigation began because of inf– reliable information that George Papadopoulos was having conversations about obtaining information from the Russians. That’s probably as far as I can go at this point.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:So where did the conversation go?

JAMES COMEY:The president was talking about something that had happened during an airing of a interview he did with Bill O’Reilly on Fox–

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:Oh the Super Bowl interview —

JAMES COMEY:Yeah. The Super Bowl pre-game show where– and I hadn’t asked any questions about this, but the president was just talking about it, he had given an answer to Bill O’Reilly that had been much criticized across the political spectrum when he had said, in response to a question, that he respected Vladimir Putin and said, “That doesn’t mean I’ll get alongside with him.”

And then O’Reilly responded, “But he’s a killer.” And the president responded, in substance, “But we’re killers, too. You assume our nation’s so harmless.” I forget the exact words, but that’s the gist of it. And that moral equivalence, between the people of our government and Putin’s thugs, had generated a lot of controversy.

And so the president was, as I said when I described the dinner, just in a monologue talking about how that was a great answer, what was he supposed to do, it was a hard question, he gave his best answer. And just going on and on and on. Basically we’re all agreeing with this if we don’t speak.

And having seen it happen during the dinner I thought, “I can not let that occur,” ’cause I don’t think it was a hard question. I think the second part of his answer is terrible. And so he gave me an opening at some point by saying like, “Yeah, you agree it was a very good answer–”

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:So the president wants you to say this was a good answer.

JAMES COMEY:Yeah. In fact, he was telling me it was a good answer and then said– gave me an opening by saying, “You assume it was an ideal answer. You assume it was a superb answer.” And then he was starting to move on. And I jumped in and I said, “Mr. President, the first part of the reply was superb, not the second part. We’re not the type of killers that Putin is.”

And when I said that, the weather changed in the room. And like a shadow crossed his face and his eyes got this strange, kinda hard look. And I thought in that moment, “I’ve just executed one thing uncommon perhaps.” And then (SNAP) it passed and the meeting was over. And, “Thanks for coming in,” and– and Priebus walked me out. It was like–

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:You had another mob flashback.

JAMES COMEY:Yeah, I did. Although in that moment I was thinking, “I simply succeeded,” although I hadn’t intended to, in ending any personal relationship between me and the president by th– by interrupting him and also criticizing him to his face. And I went back and told my staff that it happened, and then I thought– and told them, “That is not a nasty thing, because it’ll assist us hold a distance that we need to hold from him.”

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:You– you saw it right there, and we talked about this earlier– why is President Trump so reluctant to call out Vladimir Putin?

JAMES COMEY:I don’t know. I’m struck by it and I’m struck by it both in public and in private. Because I can understand the arguments why the president of the United States might not want to criticize the leader of another country because there’s always good reasons to try and build better relationships, I suppose, even when that other leader is someone who is killing his own citizens and engaging in– in attacks against our country. But you would think that in private– talking to the F.B.I. director, whose job it is to thwart Russian attacks, you might acknowledge that this enemy of ours is an enemy of ours. But I never saw. And so I don’t know the reason. I really don’t.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:Do you think the Russians have something on Donald Trump?

JAMES COMEY:I think it’s possible. I don’t know. These are more words I never thought I’d utter about a president of the United States, but it’s possible.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:That’s stunning. You can’t say for certain that the president of the United States is not compromised by the Russians?

JAMES COMEY:It is stunning and I wish I wasn’t saying it, but it’s just– it’s the truth. I cannot say that. It always struck me and still strikes me as unlikely, and I woulda been able to say with high confidence about any other president I dealt with, but I can’t. It’s possible.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:February 14th, you’re back in the Oval Office?

JAMES COMEY:Back again. Valentine’s Day. For–


JAMES COMEY:We were there for a briefing, which was a very good idea, to give the new president an understanding of the terrorism threat in the United States, which is the F.B.I.’s primary responsibility. And so I was there was the vice president and leaders of the counter terrorism agencies in a horseshoe of chairs ar– again, he’s behind the desk, in a horseshoe of chairs around the desk to tell him, “Look, this is what we’re nervous about in america.”

And– so I did most of the talking during that briefing and gave some, I thought, some pretty eye-opening insight into some threats that we don’t talk about a lot, but the president was kind of quiet, which is unusual, and unengaged. And– and then ended the meeting by thanking everybody and s– and pointing at me saying, “I simply need to speak to Jim.” And excused everyone, including the vice president.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:They didn’t want to leave.

JAMES COMEY:Well I know the attorney general didn’t want to leave because– he ac– he was– I’m sitting here, he was sitting off to my right and the door by the grandfather clock was off to my left. President was sitting where you are. And the attorney general came around and stood right by my chair and lingered. Clearly, his body language leads– to my mind said he didn’t want to leave.

And then the president said, “Thanks, Jeff. I simply need to speak to Jim. Thanks.” And then he walked off. And then staff had been sitting on the couches and chairs behind us, and one of the people back there, been– Jared Kushner, the president’s son in law, and he came to my left elbow and stood after the attorney general left and started chatting with me about the e-mail investigation, just pleasantries about how hard that must have been, and lingering as well. And then the president said, “Thanks, Jared. Thank you. Just need to speak to Jim.” And so– he was excused.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:You’re alone in the Oval Office?



JAMES COMEY:I didn’t know what was going to happen next, but I knew that whatever it was, it was really, really important that I remember everything that was said, and as best I could the exact words that were said. Because why would you kick out the attorney general, who’s my boss, and the vice president of the United States to speak to me? Something was going to happen that was going to be important to remember–

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:He knows he’s going to say something that others shouldn’t hear.

JAMES COMEY:That was my read, that it’s– it’s so unusual that– first of all, it’s unusual for the attorney general– excuse me, for the F.B.I. director and the president to be alone at all. But to kick out the vice president of the United States and the attorney general, who I work for, so you could talk to me alone, something was up that was really important. And that it might well be that he knew what everybody was going to talk about was something that he shouldn’t be talking about with the others. And so my antennae were up and I just– listened.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:And what he wanted to talk about was Mike Flynn.

JAMES COMEY:Yeah. That’s how he began it. “I need to speak about Mike Flynn.” And he started explaining to me– that Flynn was a good guy and that he had to be let go ’cause he was– had lied to the vice president and he– said he had other concerns about him, which he didn’t in that meeting spell out.

And then he– got a little bit distracted, the conversation moved off to leaks a little bit. And he talked about how bad leaks were of classified information. And I agreed. And we talked about that for a bit. And while that conversation was going on, Reince Priebus opened the door to my left, by the grandfather clock, and I turned and I can see standing waiting was a big group of people, including the vice president. And the president– waved him away and had him close the door. And then after the interruption came back to Flynn.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:So that– that prompted him to get back to business.

JAMES COMEY:Yeah. Get back to the point. He– he had wandered off on an important topic of leaks and– and urging me to talk to the attorney general about being more aggressive in pursuing leaks of classified information, all of which is fine. And then the interruption got him back to Mike Flynn, and that’s when he asked me– said he hopes I can let it go.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:And when he said that, you thought?

JAMES COMEY:He’s asking me to drop the criminal investigation of his, now former, national security advisor.


JAMES COMEY:I took it as a direction. He’s– his words were, though, “I hope you possibly can let it go.” But the context where I’ve been– where everyone’s been kicked out, and it was just the two of us, the president of the United States, I took the expression of hope as, “That is what I would like you to do.” This–

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:The president says he didn’t say that.

JAMES COMEY:Yeah. Well what am I going to do? He did. That’s why I was– when he tweeted that there might be tapes, I was– I meant what I said when I said, “Lordy, I hope there are tapes as a result of I know what happened in that– in that assembly.” And I testified about it under oath thinking there might be tapes. And so I’d be a crazy person to make it up. And I wrote it down immediately after that meeting.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:He– he– he later said there weren’t tapes in a tweet several weeks later after it hung out there for a long, long time. Which statement do you believe?

JAMES COMEY:I don’t know. I– I mean, I would assume one of the reasons, although it was a delayed revelation, that I wanted to get out into public in– that he had– that we had had this encounter, he’d asked me to let it go, is that if there were tapes only a special prosecutor was going to go get ’em. And so I don’t know. I have no insight into whether Former Director Mueller and his team subpoenaed the White House for tapes. I have no idea.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:So he says, “I hope you possibly can let it go.” What do you say?

JAMES COMEY:He had said, “He is a superb guy, I hope you’ll be able to let it go,” I think those are the exact words. But he said– and I just said, “I agree he is a superb man,” or I said, “he is a superb guy.” And so then full-stop. And there was a brief pause. And then the meeting was over.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:Should you have said more there? Should you have said, “Mr. President, I can not talk about this with you. You are doing one thing improper?”

JAMES COMEY:Maybe. I mean, that– that’s also a fair criticism. Maybe I should have. Although, as I’ve thought about it since, if he didn’t know he was doing something improper, why did he kick out the attorney general and the vice president of the United States and the leaders of the intelligence community? I mean, why am I alone if he’s– doesn’t know the nature of the request?

But it’s possible that in the moment I shoulda– you know, another person would have said, “Sir, you possibly can’t ask me that. That’s a felony investigation. That might be obstruction of justice.” Again, it’s one of these deals where I’m so– even though I knew something important was going to happen, it didn’t occur to me he was going to ask me to drop a criminal investigation. And so a little bit of it is the shock of it, and part of it is just from the environment I think I had a good gut sense that he knows what he’s doing.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:With that direction, was President Trump obstructing justice?

JAMES COMEY:Possibly. I mean, it’s certainly some evidence of obstruction of justice. It would depend and– and I’m just a witness in this case, not the investigator or prosecutor, it would depend upon other things that reflected on his intent.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:I wonder if you even should have agreed at that point that Flynn is a good guy. By February 14th, did you know that Mike Flynn had lied to the F.B.I.?


GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:So was it a mistake to even agree with the president on that point?

JAMES COMEY:Maybe. I mean, I– I actually– good people do lie, and my sense of Flynn was he was a good guy, that I sat with him and chatted with him when he was head of the Defense Intelligence Agency. And so the fact that someone lies doesn’t necessarily make them a bad person. But I think mostly it was me trying to get outta the conversation, give him a piece of what he said that’s harmless so that I cannot give him the rest.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:But you knew at this point that Mike Flynn was in some jeopardy.




GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:Did the president know that?

JAMES COMEY:I don’t know. That is obviously an area that a special prosecutor would want to investigate. I don’t know the answer to that.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:There’s been some reporting that– at– at– at one point you told the Congress that the agency who interviewed Mike Flynn didn’t believe that he had lied.

JAMES COMEY:Yeah, I saw that. And that– I don’t know where that’s coming from. That– unless I’m– I– I– said something that people misunderstood, I don’t remember even intending to say that. So my recollection is I never said that to anybody.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:So at this point– the president is now, given what you thought was a direction– you didn’t step in and say, “Pay attention, you should not do this, Mr. President,” at some point in your mind, as you’re writing these notes, have you shifted to collecting evidence of a possible crime?

JAMES COMEY:Well, yes, in a sense. I mean, I am recording it bec– for the s– same reason I recorded the earlier one, but it’s even more important that I record this one because the conversation will likely come back some day and he may well lie about it. And so I need to remember exactly what was said there. It could be evidence of a crime. It was really important that it be well documented.

I shared it with– my colleagues at the F.B.I. But something else was true, it was important that we did not intend to abide his direction, we were not going to let it go, no matter what he said. And so it was really important that we not let the investigators yet know this had happened, because we worried it might chill them in some way if you hear the president wants your case to go away.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:So you’re holding this evidence. You share it with your deputy, your general counsel.


GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:You don’t share it with the attorney general.



JAMES COMEY:We thought– rightly, he was about to recuse himself on anything related to Russia and so that didn’t make sense. The harder question was, should we tell the person who is acting in the role as deputy attorney general, which was a U.S. attorney who was there temporarily? And decided that didn’t make any sense either, that we would wait until we got a new– there’s nothing to be done, since there was no way to corroborate it, the idea of tapes didn’t occur to us, that we would be getting new leadership a that deputy attorney general level. And then the department would figure out how they were going to supervise all the Russia stuff.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:So at this point it’s almost as if there’s an investigation within the investigation.

JAMES COMEY:Well there’s a box within the investigation where we’re holding a piece of information so that we can figure out what to do about it later. So it’s– we are walling it off, since we couldn’t think– the leaders of the F.B.I. couldn’t think of what logical investigations you would do now, that you needed to do right now, so there would be no harm in holding it and then figuring out what to do with it as the investigation went on.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:So i– i– i– if the president hadn’t fired you, would that information still be boxed up?

JAMES COMEY:Oh no. No. ‘Cause we’d have– we’d have gotten guidance at some point as to how they were going to lead the Russia investigation and then have to figure out what investigation we could do to try to corroborate that. What would we do with that? But firing me certainly accelerated it, in a way it wouldn’t have been accelerated before.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:What were you thinking as you left the Oval Office that day?

JAMES COMEY:That something really important just happened and that I was a little– another one of those outta-body experiences, like, “Actually? The president just kicked out the lawyer basic to ask me to drop a legal investigation.” Wow, the world s– continues to go crazy.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:Calls you been– calls you back a couple weeks later. The next phone call was– and that was just kind of a check-in. Right?

JAMES COMEY:Yeah. Said the world had gone crazy. I was about to get on a helicopter and the president called me just to, he didn’t say this, but I heard it in my own head as just, “Hey, what’s up?” And it was to find out, “So how are you doing?” I said, “Great, sir. How are you doing?” And it was just a check-in.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:And that was March 1st. Did you ever look back– at– at the day and– and– get any sense of what might have prompted that phone call?

JAMES COMEY:No, I never did.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:He then called you again– it was actually a few weeks later– March 30th. He’s more agitated now–



JAMES COMEY:I think two reasons. M– most prominently that there had been a hearing where, at the Department of Justice direction, I had confirmed for the first time that we had open– counter intelligence investigation to understand whether any Americans associated with the Trump campaign were working with the Russians. And– and so that obviously caught his attention.

And then I think there continued to be a lotta stuff in the news about the Russia investigation. So he was calling me to tell me how frustrating he found that and it was getting in the way of his ability to make deals for the country. And he wanted to lift the cloud, he called it a cloud. And so wanted me to get out that he wasn’t under investigation.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:So if he’s not under investigation, you’ve told him, why not tell the country?

JAMES COMEY:Well for– for the reasons that the F.B.I. general counsel was concerned about me in the first instance telling then President-elect Trump he wasn’t under investigation, it– it was– potentially misleading and also would create a duty to correct that. And there was a challenge also with, so what’s the limiting principle? If they ask, “Is the vice chairman underneath investigation,” do you answer that?

And then if they say, “Is the lawyer basic underneath investigation,” do you answer that? And– where do you stop? And so the Department of Justice was thinking about it and had decided, in connection with my testimony, that they would only authorize me to say there was an investigation but not to comment on who was under investigation. But they did one other thing, they had me tell the leaders of the intelligence committees exactly who we were investigating, the– which is unusual, the identities of the Americans which did not include the president.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:What part of you is thinking also, “I’m accumulating proof on the president”?

JAMES COMEY:Well part of me is thinking that because of the obstruc– potential obstruction issue, but also I continued to believe that there was force to the F.B.I. general counsel’s argument that we’re going to have to look at the president. I– even if you– even if you took the– the f– my conversation with him about Flynn as a potential obstruction, you put it off to the side and said, “Properly that is totally different than the Russia investigation,” even on the Russia investigation there was continuing s– and stronger force to the argument that you’re inevitably going to look at his conduct, ’cause he’s the head of the campaign.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:And for at least a period of time they’re trying to build a tower in Moscow.


GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:April 11th. Final phone call.

JAMES COMEY:Yeah. This was a follow-up where he’s– I think it’s the only phone call or contact that I had with him that involved no preamble talking about how awesome I am and how great it is– or he just began by expressing his frustration– no. His voice was frustrated, his– he began by asking, “So what did you do with my request to get out that I’m not underneath investigation, to carry the cloud?”

And I explained to him that I had referred it to the acting deputy attorney general and I hadn’t heard back. And that– that was frustrating to him. And then I explained to him how it should work. He should have the White House counsel contact the Justice Department if he wants to find out– he has a request to make. And that was the last time I spoke to him.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:But isn’t that where he said, “We had that factor”?

JAMES COMEY:Yeah. He said, “‘Cause I have been excellent to you. I have been loyal to you,” words like that. “We had that thing. You realize?” And then he pulled up short, because the– there was no pledge of loyalty.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:In his mind when he says, “We had that thing,” does he think he made you F.B.I. director, kept you F.B.I. director, that’s why you owe him?

JAMES COMEY:I– I– I could be wrong about this, but I’ll tell you what my reaction was, he’s reaching for the– the goal of that loyalty dinner, that he’s remembering that he had a dinner with me and he’s starting to say, “I have been very loyal to you and you promised to be loyal to me.”

And then he pulls up short because if he’s replaying the dinner in his head, he remembers the awkward stare and then he remembers that weird formulation about always be honest and then honest loyalty. And again, I could be wrong about that, but my gut told me that’s what he’s reaching for and he’s pulling up short because, “We each know I by no means promised to be loyal to you, in the best way you perceive it.”

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:And then on Friday, May 9th, your tenure as F.B.I. director– excuse me– then on May 9th your tenure as F.B.I. director ends.

JAMES COMEY:Yeah. When I’m in Los Angeles at the– F.B.I. field office in Los Angeles, about to go to a diversity recruiting event.


JAMES COMEY:I was doing what I did many, many times visiting F.B.I. offices, I was walking around thanking everybody personally. And there was a group of employees who didn’t have desks that I could visit, they were the custodial employees and then the communications room employee. And so they were all s– in a group in a big, central room and I was standing talking to them.

And the room had televisions on the wall at the very back. And I was in the middle of thanking them for being part of the F.B.I. and its mission and explaining everybody owns the mission, they are no support employees. And I saw, “Comey resigns,” on the back screens. And one of the many great–


JAMES COMEY:Yeah, it said, “Resigns.” And one of the many great things about the F.B.I. is we have some hilarious pranksters in that organization, and so I thought it was a scam by someone on my staff. So I turn to the– them and I said, “Somebody put a lotta work into that.” And then I continued talking.

And then the– that changed on the screens, which showed the different networks, changed to, “Comey fired.” And the– now I’m staring it and the– the audience could see my face change, so they start turning around looking at the back. And I said, “Look, I don’t know whether or not that’s true or not. I’ll go discover out.”

“But what I need to say to you will not change whether or not or not– that is true.” And then I finished talking about the mission of the F.B.I., how everybody has to be part of it. And I thanked them for their work, I shook all their hands, then I went into a room to find out have I been fired, because I did not expect to be fired.


JAMES COMEY:Eventually my assistant, Althea James– there was an actual person down on Pennsylvania Avenue knocking on the front door of the F.B.I. with a letter from the president. And she somehow got the F.B.I. police to go down and get it, scanned it, e-mailed it to me. And this took probably a half hour or so. Said, “Yeah,” I’ve been fired. “President of america, there is a letter from him saying I’m fired efficient immediately.”

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:So you’re looking at that letter, what’s your first thought?

JAMES COMEY:That’s crazy. How could that be? But they also, I think, s– attached to it a letter from the attorney general and a letter from the– the deputy attorney general, purporting to lay out the reasons I was fired. And so I think it at– I think I saw those actually the same time, and my reaction was, “That is senseless at all.”

And– and then I took a call from Patrice who called saying the kids and she had seen it, “What’s going on?” I said, “I do not know. We’re trying to find out.” My friend Pat Fitzgerald called from Chicago, I said the same thing. And then John Kelly, who was then the secretary of Homeland Security, called me.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:Now White House chief of staff.

JAMES COMEY:Now White House chief of staff.


JAMES COMEY:He was very upset. He was very emotional and said he had seen the news and that he intended to resign because he wouldn’t work for people who would treat someone like me in such a dishonorable way and that he was going to quit.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:What did you tell him?

JAMES COMEY:Please don’t do that. Please don’t do that, John. And I knew him well and still– knew– thought highly of him then, still think highly of him, and I said, “Please do not do this. This president needs individuals of character and precept round him, particularly this president. Please don’t do this.” And I said, “We’d like you to stay and serve for the nation.”

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:If he called you today saying he intended to quit, what would you tell him?

JAMES COMEY:I understand. I– I think you’ve– you’ve sacrificed as much as you really can of yourself for the country. And– no one would begrudge you leaving. You’ve done your absolute best. It’s– it’s come at a cost to you, but– that no one can blame you.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:I want to get back to the story — but one more question. I think it’s to an important point that– when you’re talking about being an ethical leader, at what point do people serve in order to protect the institution, to protect the country, and at what point does it cross over into enabling bad behavior?

JAMES COMEY:That is the question that people have to ask themselves. And– and there’s no easy way to define it in the abstract, that you– the challenge of this president is that he will stain everyone around him. And the question is, how much stain is too much stain and how much stain eventually makes you unable to accomplish your goal of protecting the country and serving the country? So I don’t know. And it– it– it would be hard for anybody to answer that. But everyone’s gotta answer that individually.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:Could you imagine if you hadn’t been fired on May 9th– if you hadn’t been fired on May 9th, would you still be working for President Trump?

JAMES COMEY:Yes. I– I would– yes, I would. I– as I told President Obama, I was dreading it and I– I would be im– an unhappy F.B.I. director, but in a way proud of the organization and in my role in trying to protect it. And the current F.B.I. director is a friend of mine, is an honorable person.

I’m so glad that he’s serving, ’cause I know he cares about the institutional values the way I do. It’s hard, you gotta constantly worry about efforts to compromise you and compromise your institution. But in the end, to answer your question, that’s– that is question and that’s one that everybody has to answer individually.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:You say you were surprised as you read the letter. Weren’t you angry?

JAMES COMEY:Yeah, I don’t remember being angry. I remember just thinking, “This can be a lie.” The stuff about, you know, being fired because of the Hillary Clinton e-mail investigation, that makes no sense at all. And then, of course, I quickly saw on the news that, you know, the White House saying that the F.B.I. was in tatters and the workforce– it was relieved that I was fired. More and more lies. And so I was worried about the organization, worried about the people– who I’m supposed to meet with right after that and confused. I don’t remember being angry in that moment.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:Also had to find a way to get home.

JAMES COMEY:Yeah. It– ’cause I’m no longer F.B.I. director, so how do I get home? I– I actually gave thought to renting a convertible and driving almost 3,000 miles, something I’ve never done. I’ve had friends drive across country, but I’m not single or crazy so I didn’t do it. And I left it to the– who– my deputy, who immediately had become the acting director of the F.B.I., to figure that out.

And the– the head of my security detail, who’s an amazing person, said, “Sir, we will determine this out. But when I have to place you in handcuffs, we’re taking you again on the F.B.I. aircraft.” And I said, “Properly look, I need to do no matter is acceptable beneath the regulation and the laws, so you all figure that out.” And they figured out that they had an obligation to protect me and so they would bring me back on the plane.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:So you’re in that private jet basically alone.



JAMES COMEY:I broke F.B.I. rules. I was no longer an employee so I wasn’t breaking the rules. So I took a bottle of red wine out of my suitcase that I was bringing back from California, a California pinot noir, and I drank red wine from a paper coffee cup and just looked out at the lights of the country I love so much as we flew home.

And then I– as– we got close to the airport in Washington, I asked the pilots could I sit up with them, ’cause I’d never done it. Been all over the world with these pilots and sat in the passenger’s seat. Hundreds of flights, I’d never sat up there and watched them do their work. So they put the headphones on me and I sat on a jump seat between the two pilots and watched them land along the Potomac. And– and then we shook hands with tears in our eyes and then I left and get driven home.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:That’s it. The pinnacle of your professional career, it’s over–

JAMES COMEY:Yeah. Yeah. Over in a flash. Yeah. Makes no sense at all. But–

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:Did you– realize then, or could you realize then, the consequences of you being fired?

JAMES COMEY:No. I was a bit numb at the time. And I thought, “It’s crazy to fireside me.” I’m leading the investigation of Russian influence and particularly whether the– anyone in the Trump orbit had coordinated and conspired with the Russians. That makes no sense at all. And the reasons they’ve given make no sense at all, are clearly a pretense.

But I was numb enough that I just thought, “Nicely that’s the president’s legal right to fireside me and so I gotta work out what I’ll do with the rest of my life.” And so I was trying to put it out of my mind and just sleep and exercise and hang out with my wife and kids. And it wasn’t until the president tweeted at me that Friday morning after I was fired that, “James Comey higher hope there aren’t tapes of our conversations,” that I sorta snapped back to the present.

In fact, it wasn’t even then. I snapped back three days later in the middle of the night. I woke up in the middle of the night and the thought hit me like a lightening bolt, like, “Wait a minute. If there are tapes, he might be heard on that tape in the Oval Office asking me to let it go. There’s corroboration or might be corroboration for the thing we thought we’ll never be capable of corroborate.”

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:Of a possible crime.

JAMES COMEY:Yeah. Of possible obstruction of justice. Somebody’s gotta go get those tapes. I trust the F.B.I., right, ’cause they’ll see what I see. But I don’t trust the leadership of the Department of Justice to do it. And so–


JAMES COMEY:Well the attorney general was recused and the deputy attorney general, in my view, had acted dishonorably by putting out this pretext about why I was fired. So I thought, “Nicely he is ‘amica nostra.’ Right? He is part of the family now. I can not belief him.” And so what can I do? I can do something now.

I’m a private citizen and I have in my safe downstairs an unclassified memo about that conversation. And I’m a private citizen, I can tell people about conversations with the president that are unclassified. And so I’m going to do it. And so I asked a friend of mine to get it out to a reporter. And my goal was to prompt the Department of Justice to appoint a special prosecutor, go get the tapes. That’s all I was thinking about was the tapes. Go get the tapes. Go get the tapes–

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:You– you documented every encounter you had with President Trump going back to the time he was president-elect from the Trump Tower meeting.

JAMES COMEY:Yeah. I think there’s a written record of– we– and I’ve left it out, we– he and I had one conversation on the phone, it was about a classified topic that was totally appropriate and– and so I don’t know whether I did a memo on that. But nearly every encounter I documented, either with a memo– and some of them were classified– memos and so I obviously created them at the F.B.I. and left them at the F.B.I.

But for the unclassified encounters, I wrote them up on my personal computer, printed them on my printer, with my paper, and kept a copy here. But because I also want to protect the bureau, I left a copy at the F.B.I. But thank goodness I kept a copy here, because I was banned from the property.

One of the orders that was issued is I was never to be allowed back on F.B.I. property, like I had killed somebody. So my staff had to box my stuff up and send it home. But I had the memo in my safe, my unclassified memo. And I thought, “If I get that out, that’ll put super strain on the Division of Justice to have any person go get the tapes earlier than President Trump might destroy them–”

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:And those tapes, in your mind, would be evidence of a possible crime.

JAMES COMEY:Yes. And I would be heard on those tapes in that conversation with the president, and he would be heard saying, “I hope you’ll be able to let it go.” And I would be heard saying, “I agree he is a superb guy.”

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:President’s tweeted innumerable times calling you a leaker– because of that. First of all, what’s your response to President Trump?

JAMES COMEY:Look, it’s true, I mean, I’m the one who testified about it, that’s how people know about it, that I gave that unclassified– this is a whole nother conversation about whether you can leak unclassified information, I don’t want to get involved in that. I gave that unclassified memo to my mind, who was also acting as my lawyer, but this wasn’t a lawyer task, and asked him to give it to a reporter. That is entirely appropriate.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:Why not do it yourself? Why not do it openly, transparently?

JAMES COMEY:Yeah. For one very practical reason. At the end of my driveway was a horde or media and my thought was, “If I do it myself, it’s going to be like feeding seagulls on the seashore.” That if I give it to one reporter then what’s my answer to all the others about why I won’t answer their questions? How do I fence it off–

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:But– but how do you– how do you weight that inconvenience against the ethics of being more open?

JAMES COMEY:I– well I– I guess that’s fair criticism, but my reaction was, “I’ll get the knowledge out.” I know the information is true and if I’m ever asked about it, of course I’ll tell the truth about it. Which is– the first time I was asked about it I did.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:President also– several different tweets calls you a liar.



JAMES COMEY:What am I going to do? Yeah. People have to make their own judgments about other people. I would ask people– when I– whenever we would evaluate a witness you’d always say, “So what’s their body of labor? So what are they like? What’s their sample and apply? Is their story internally constant? Did they document it?” All of those questions. But I’m not going to make that argument for myself.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:The day after you were fired– president is meeting in the Oval Office with the Russian foreign minister. Calls you a nut job. Says the pressure’s been relieved now, the pressure on him has been relieved. What did you think when you saw that?

JAMES COMEY:Wow, was my reaction. First of all, what are the Russians doing in the Oval Office? One, as a counter intelligence person I’m thinking, “That’s crazy–” without any Americans being present, one. And, two, it– the pretense is melting away, the bit about, “You have been fired because of the way you dealt with the e-mail investigation,” is melting away. You were fired because of the Russia investigation. That’s the substance of what I heard those words as.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:And then that Lester Holt interview.

JAMES COMEY:Right. Same thing. The pretense has now melted.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:So if there is evidence of a crime, you want it out there, you want there to be an investigation, you wanted a special counsel.

JAMES COMEY:Yeah, I did.


JAMES COMEY:Because I wanted someone without political conflict, someone who is not “amica nostra,” to find the facts. And I don’t know what they’ll find. I don’t know whether Bob Mueller s– and his people will conclude that President Trump committed a crime or not. I don’t really care, so long as it’s done in the right way, confidently, honestly and independently.

And I know the F.B.I. would be that way, and now I know the prosecutors will be that way. And whatever they find, the American people can rely on because they will find the truth. Again, I don’t sit here saying, “I hope the trust is that,” or, “I hope the truth is this.” I just want them to find the truth. And I’m confident that they will, unless he’s interfered with in some way.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:You’ve been interviewed by Robert Mueller?

JAMES COMEY:I’m not going to talk about my contact with the special counsel.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:You’re free to do to that. Correct?

JAMES COMEY:Yes, but I also want to make sure that I– don’t– I don’t do anything that might get in the way of their ability to be effective.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:Do you think there’s any chance that– that writing this book will get in the way?

JAMES COMEY:I don’t know. I hope not. I mean, because I’ve tried to be consistent. What you worry about with interviews or with– with– with a witness writing a book is, does their story change? And again, that’s the virtue of the memos, is that I’ve tried to be true to the memos and not create inconsistent statements.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:And you also had to testify to Congress about all that– a few weeks later. That was a dramatic moment– for the country, it appeared to be a powerful, personal moment for you. What were you trying to do there?

JAMES COMEY:I was trying to speak at the beginning of that to the people of the F.B.I., because one of the things that happened with me being banned by the president from the property is I never got to say, “Goodbye,” to these individuals. And once I stated the stuff was lies concerning the F.B.I. being in tatters and being glad to eliminate me, I meant it.

I used to be very, very near that workforce they usually have been very close to me. And I do know this ‘explanation for the packing containers and packing containers of letters and cards they’ve despatched me. However I never acquired an opportunity to say, “Thank you,” and to border it and say, “sustain with your mission,” those kinds of things. And so I thought, “This is the prospect.”

And I wrote the substantive information that the Senate committee wanted in advance so that I could talk in my opening to the people of the F.B.I. And I wanted to do it from heart, and so I didn’t use any notes. A s– decision I was regretting standing there with butterflies in my stomach before walking out. And it was emotional for me because I love that organization, I love the mission, I love those people.

And– and so saying, “Goodbye,” to them was an emotional thing for me. And I almost didn’t get through it. I started to choke up talking about them. But I knew it would mean a lot to them, and I knew it would offer me a measure of closure. And it just really wasn’t what the Senate committee wanted to hear, but I thought, “I’ve a chance now,” and so I took it.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:It is so clear how much you love the F.B.I. Are you convince you didn’t hurt it?

JAMES COMEY:No. I’m convinced– well I guess it’s easy to convince yourself, but I’m convinced that it was hurt as little as possible by virtue of what I did and that it would have been hurt more in other ways. But no, I– I think making the decisions I had to make hurt the organization.

The F.B.I.– you know, and the presidency of Donald Trump hurts the organization. The organization’s not politicized, that stuff is all nonsense. It’s an apolitical organization, but it’s subject now to extraordinary attack. And I trace that all the way back to the beginning of the e-mail investigation.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:And can it survive the attacks?

JAMES COMEY:Yes, it can survive the attacks. It’ll take a while to recover, and damage will be done to the country, because the essence of the F.B.I. is a special agent knocking on a door and talking to a crime victim and convincing them to come forward or standing up in a courtroom and telling a jury, “I discovered this within the left-hand drawer of this fraudster’s desk,” and being believed at the door and in the courtroom.

And the constant attacks, constant attacks, risks undermining that. And that’s why– my concern about the attacks on the F.B.I. is not a political thing, we all need that organization as a country. Everyone should want the F.B.I. to be that other in American life. And right now it’s the Republicans who are attacking it.

Democrats are doing a whole lot of attacking last year because the teams are on different sides. We have to recognize, we want an organization that is not on anyone’s side. That’s in the national interest. And I hope people can rise above, come back to the title of the book, have a higher loyalty above your tribe to the things that matter for the country.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:Before we broke, you mentioned that they didn’t trust the Justice Department. What do you make of the attorney general?

JAMES COMEY:I don’t know what to make of him. I mean, I only worked with him very briefly before I was fired. My sense of him, maybe it’s unfair to him, was that he was over matched for the job. And– that the job was f– much, much bigger than he was. And that he was going to struggle in it. That’s my sense.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:And you also said that the deputy attorney general, who’s now running the Russia investigation, you said what he put out in support of your firing was just a pretext, and the pretense then fell away. So can the American people have confidence in the man who’s supervising the Russia investigation?

JAMES COMEY:Yes, in this sense. First of all, the American people can have complete confidence in Robert Mueller. As I said– earlier, he and I are not close friends, but I’ve known him and watched his work–

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:You’ve had dinner, played golf?

JAMES COMEY:Yeah. I think we played golf once in our 25 years. And– sorry, and– and I’ve had dinner with him maybe once or twice. So I know him and I can s– and I– we’re friendly. But I know his work most of all. And I’ve watched it closely. He’s not on anybody’s side. He does not care about anything except the truth. And so they can have great confidence if Bob Mueller is let– left in place to do his job, he will find the truth.

And again, I don’t know what that will be. He may conclude that there is nothing that touches President Trump or any of his senior people. And that’s fine, so long as he’s able to find that truth. And so that’s the most important thing. And I also think the deputy attorney general– I don’t know this, but has likely learned a painful lesson from the way he handled my firing. And so it gives him all the more reason to act honorably in overseeing Director Mueller.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:What will– what will it mean if President Trump is tries to fire Robert Mueller?

JAMES COMEY:It would, I hope, set off alarm bells that this is his most serious attack yet on the rule of law. And it would be something that our entire country– again, Democrats and Republicans, that is higher than all the normal fights about policy. That is about the values of this country and the rule of law. And it would be to the everlasting shame of partisans if they were unable to see that higher level and to protect it.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:Do you think the deputy attorney general’ll carry out that order?

JAMES COMEY:No. I don’t. I think, given his experience with me, that– that he has an opportunity in overseeing Bob Mueller to restore some of his professional reputation. And I’m m– highly confident that he would refuse to abide that order.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:And if Robert Mueller decides to bring a case, would you be a witness for the prosecution?

JAMES COMEY:Sure, if he asked me to be. I’m a fact witness. That relates to– I’m sure, to an obstruction investigation. Where that’s going to go, I don’t know. But potentially, I’d be– I’d be a witness.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:Are there things you don’t know that you haven’t said that could damage President Trump?

JAMES COMEY:Things that I don’t know that I haven’t said?

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:Thing– I’m sorry. Are there– are there things that you know but haven’t said that could damage President Trump?

JAMES COMEY:That’s a good question. I don’t think so. I don’t think I’m holding back on you. I’m not talking about the details of investigations. But I left a long time ago. And there’s been a lotta work done since the day I was fired. And so I don’t– I have no idea what Bob Mueller has.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:But you read the papers. You follow the investigation. Do you think people tied to President Trump colluded with the Russians?

JAMES COMEY:I don’t know is the honest answer. That– that was th– what we were trying to investigate at the time. Was anyone aiding the Russians, conspiring with the Russians? There’s no doubt there was smoke around that. Whether there’s fire, I– I didn’t stay long enough to know.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:You write that President Trump is unethical, untethered to the truth. Is Donald Trump unfit to be president?

JAMES COMEY:Yes. But not in the way m– I often hear people talk about it. I don’t buy this stuff about him being mentally incompetent or early stages of dementia. He strikes me as a person of above average intelligence who’s tracking conversations and knows what’s going on. I don’t think he’s medically unfit to be president. I think he’s morally unfit to be president.

A person who sees moral equivalence in Charlottesville, who talks about and treats women like they’re pieces of meat, who lies constantly about matters big and small and insists the American people believe it, that person’s not fit to be president of the United States, on moral grounds. And that’s not a policy statement. Again, I don’t care what your views are on guns or immigration or taxes.

There’s something more important than that that should unite all of us, and that is our president must embody respect and adhere to the values that are at the core of this country. The most important being truth. This president is not able to do that. He is morally unfit to be president.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:You’re the former director of the F.B.I. You’ve served in senior positions in the Department of Justice for Republican and Democratic presidents. And you think Donald Trump is unfit– s– the bottom line standard, unfit to be president?

JAMES COMEY:I do. I do. And I– I– I hope one of the things that comes outta the Trump administration his first term is a recognition that, as much as we fight about those policy issues in this country, what’s at the core of this nation, we are just a collection of ideas. And at the core of those ideas is that there is a thing called truth.

There is the rule of law. There is integrity. Those things matter before any fights about policies. And people who tell themselves, “Properly, yes, Donald Trump is unethical but I am getting the correct Supreme Courtroom justice or the suitable regulatory rollback,” are kidding themselves because if we lose that tether to the truth, if that stops being the norm at the heart of our public life, what are we?

Where are we as a country? So I worry sometimes people think I’m talking about politics. Not in the way we normally talk about in this country. But I hope in the most important way. Values matter. This president does not reflect the values of this country.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:If you are right, what is the remedy? Should Donald Trump be impeached?

JAMES COMEY:Impeachment is– is a question of law and fact and politics. And so that’ll be determined by people gather–

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:You’re a citizen. You have a judgment.

JAMES COMEY:Yeah, I’ll tell you, I’ll give you a strange answer. I hope not because I think impeaching and removing Donald Trump from office would let the American people off the hook and have something happen indirectly that I believe they’re duty bound to do directly. People in this country need to stand up and go to the voting booth and vote their values.

We’ll fight about guns. We’ll fight about taxes. We’ll fight about all those other things down the road. But you cannot have, as president of the United States, someone who does not reflect the values that I believe Republicans treasure and Democrats treasure and Independents treasure. That is the core of this country. That’s our foundation. And so impeachment, in a way, would short circuit that.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:But– but if Robert Mueller finds evidence of obstruction of justice, what is the remedy?

JAMES COMEY:Well, sure. Tha– I– I didn’t mean to say that I want them to stop doing their investigation or whatever flows from that. But in a way, as a citizen, I think we owe it to each other to get off the couch and think about what unites us. I think about the people who supported Trump, and continue to support Trump.

A lotta them come from families with a proud history of military service. And that’s a wonderful thing. What did their fathers and grandfathers fight and die for? Not for immigration policy. Not for a tax policy. Not for Supreme Court justice. They fought and died for a set of ideas. The rule of law. Freedom of speech. Freedom of religion. The truth.

That’s what they fought and died for. And at some point, we have to focus on that and make sure that whoever’s leading us embodies those and we judge that leader by their tether to those values. Then we’ll go back to fighting like cats and dogs about all the things we normally fight about.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:I’ve talked to a lotta people who’ve watched you for a long time– worked with you, admire you. And some of them come out with– with this storyline on James Comey. “Right here was a guy who beloved being F.B.I. director. He needed to maintain that job more than anything on the planet. That is why he didn’t converse up on several totally different events when he should’ve spoken up– about President Trump. And that is why he’s talking out now. He obtained fired. He is indignant.”

JAMES COMEY:I get that. I mean, I get why people would think that. That’s just not right though. I mean, if all I cared about was getting the job and going along, getting along, it’s hard to explain some of the things I did during 2016. My goal with President Trump was to try and find a way to work with a new administration and protect the integrity of the F.B.I. That was my goal. I’m sure I did it imperfectly. You’ve pointed out w– I think reasonably ways in which I could’ve done it better or differently. That was my goal.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:At any point did you think, “I should resign”?

JAMES COMEY:No. In fact, at any point I thought, “I have to stay to protect this institution.”

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:Are you braced for a s– tweet storm from President Trump?

JAMES COMEY:Sure. I don’t follow him on Twitter, but I’m sure it’s going to come. And that’s okay. I mean, that’s okay.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:You close the book with a very vivid image describing the Trump presidency. What is that?

JAMES COMEY:I think of it as a forest fire. That forest fires do tremendous damage. His presidency is doing, and will do, tremendous damage to our norms and our values, especially the truth. And so that’s bad. And terrible things happen in forest fires.

But I’m an optimistic person. And so I choose to see the opportunity in a forest fire ’cause what forest fires do is allow things to grow that never could’ve grown. Were crowded out, didn’t have the light or the water to grow. And so I see already things growing and flourishing that didn’t before this fire.

I see the kids marching in the streets, including my own kids, about guns. I see all kinds of civil society getting engaged. I see parents talking to their kids about truth telling and prejudice and bias and respect. That was not happening three or four years ago. And so there’s a lot of good growing.

And I also see the Courts and Congress getting involved in ways they hadn’t before. So I choose to see opportunity. I think this forest fire will leave us better and stronger, as did the last forest fire. Watergate was a forest fire. It re-balanced power among the branches of government. I think we’re going to see that. And I think we’re going to be better for it.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:Couple years back, you gave a speech I think to the F.B.I. personnel saying, “If we fall in love with our personal virtue, we will go sideways.” At any level during the last two years, did you fall prey to that? Did you fall in love with your personal virtue?

JAMES COMEY:I do not assume so. However I apprehensive about it continually. And– and the guardrail for that, because that is an enormous fear I’ve about myself, was to surround myself with individuals who will hit that. Hit at the certainty. Hit on the satisfaction to ensure I’ve considered things properly.

I hope individuals learn the ebook for a variety of reasons. It is about leadership and exhibits the importance of surrounding your self with people who will poke at you, who will insist that you simply see the truth about different stuff. However most of all, about yourself ’cause I have a lotta strengths, I’ve a lotta weaknesses. And I need to ensure the individuals around me know that and assist me guardrail towards these weaknesses.


JAMES COMEY:How does– you imply m– how does my involvement finish?

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS:As an instance two th– f– to start with, for the nation, how does this finish?

JAMES COMEY:I feel almost certainly, in an important presidential election– the subsequent presidential election, where I do hope individuals of all political stripes will understand what unites us is actually more essential than what divides us. And that we now have to decide on a leader– I don’t care what celebration a pacesetter’s from. We now have to decide on a pacesetter who will embody the s– values– the values of this nation. That is how I hope it ends.


JAMES COMEY:I’ll train. I’ll travel around and discuss leadership. I need to be helpful, particularly to young individuals. It is actually enjoyable to interact with younger individuals. Speak about people who will poke and prod you. But I need to supply them a imaginative and prescient of this is what it ought to appear to be.

I’ve by no means fairly gotten there, however this is what it ought to seem like. Do not withdraw. Get into the general public square. Be a part of the lifetime of this nation ’cause we’d like you so badly. And whenever you do it, think about what issues most of all. And that’s the values concerned in your institutions.


JAMES COMEY:Thanks, George.

Copyright © 2019 ABC News Web Ventures.